ArticleJournal of arrhythmia2025
Phase Variance Analysis for Identifying Heterogeneous Conduction Regions in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Impact of Recording Duration.
Article in Journal of arrhythmia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Phase Variance Analysis for Identifying Heterogeneous Conduction Regions in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Impact of Recording Duration.Journal of arrhythmia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Phase variance analysis, which quantifies the spatial heterogeneity of local activation, has been proposed as a method to characterize complex conduction patterns in atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the influence of recording duration on its reliability remains unclear. This study aimed to determine how recording duration affects the accuracy and reproducibility of identifying heterogeneous conduction regions by phase variance analysis. Methods: Intracardiac electrogram recordings (30 s) were obtained from 16 left atrial sites in 5 patients with persistent AF. A reference phase variance map (REF) was generated by averaging instantaneous phase variance maps over the full 30-s dataset to represent the frequency of local conduction heterogeneity. Thirteen recording durations (0.01-25 s) were defined as experimental conditions. For each duration, 100 randomly selected segments were extracted, and estimated phase variance maps (ESTs) were computed using the same temporal averaging method. Accuracy was evaluated by calculating the structural similarity index measure (SSIM) between ESTs and REF, while reproducibility was assessed using pixel-wise standard deviations across subsamplings. Results: Longer recording durations produced higher SSIM values and lower standard deviations. With durations ≥ 10 s, SSIM consistently exceeded 0.95, including outliers, and standard deviations fell below 0.015, indicating accurate and stable estimation of complex conduction patterns. Conclusions: Adequate recording duration enables accurate and reproducible estimation of heterogeneous conduction regions using phase variance analysis, even in persistent AF with complex conduction patterns. This method may support optimal ablation target selection and improve treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.