ReviewVirus evolution2025
The importance of epistasis in the evolution of viral pathogens.
Review in Virus evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- In silico analysis of pH stabilising mutations of hemagglutinin of influenza A virus H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b.Npj viruses · 2026Review
- Understanding Basic Concepts of Viral Quasispecies: From Evolutionary Dynamics to Clinical Relevance.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Reducing the sensitivity of Halomonas sp. to oxygen availability through adaptive laboratory evolution.Microbial cell factories · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the genetic and genomic underpinnings of infectious disease outbreaks has emerged as a frontier of epidemiology. Here, we argue that epistasis-where the phenotypic effects of mutations or gene variants are dictated by the presence of other mutations or genes-should become a focus of genomic epidemiology. To demonstrate this, we present the results of a systematic review of the literature on epistasis in viruses, focusing on three major human viral systems: (i) influenza, (ii) SARS-CoV-2, and (iii) human immunodeficiency virus, as well as two other bodies of the literature mainly focusing on nonhuman viruses: (iv) tobacco etch virus and (v) experimental evolution of viruses. Our systematic review of these five bodies of the literature highlights that epistasis is prevalent in host-virus systems of various kinds, manifesting within and between different loci, with effects of different magnitudes and directions, and shaping various phenotypic traits of epidemiological interest. At the same time, our systematic review demonstrates that our ability to draw general conclusions about the direction and magnitude of epistasis in viral evolution is constrained by several factors: the idiosyncrasies of virus-host systems, biases in the underlying data collection exercises, and the limitations of existing methods. Moving forward, we encourage collaborations between genomic epidemiologists and evolutionary biologists to identify and measure epistasis in studying the evolution of viral pathogens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.