ArticleEnvironmental modeling and assessment2025
Spatially Optimised Approach for Predicting Water Quality in a Heterogeneous Agricultural Watershed.
Article in Environmental modeling and assessment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predicting water quality in a heterogeneous watershed is challenging because parameters and prediction accuracy vary with space. Therefore, spatially adaptive machine learning models were introduced for predicting water quality conditions in the Haraz and Babolroud watersheds, Iran. Initially, the Irrigated Water Quality Index (IWQI) was calculated. Then, spatial clusters of 16 water quality stations having similar physiochemical characteristics were identified. In the next step, numerical prediction models were developed for each cluster by assessing the prediction accuracy of six machine learning models including support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), extra trees (ET), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), decision trees (DT), and boosted regression trees (BRT). Finally, a sensitivity analysis was carried out to investigate the sets of key parameters needed to enhance water quality prediction using locally optimised prediction models. The findings indicated that water quality varied across the study area and three clusters, based on physico-chemical characteristics of the water quality, of the monitored stations were identified. The XGBoost model gave the highest accuracy and performance in cluster 1, 2, and 3 with
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.