ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
NITINOL MATERIAL PROPERTIES OF 11 COMMERCIAL PERIPHERAL STENTS DETERMINED USING INVERSE COMPUTATIONAL ANALYSIS.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stent-artery interactions are influenced by the mechanical properties of self-expanding Nitinol stents, but data on these characteristics remain limited. Eleven stents (Absolute Pro, S.M.A.R.T. Control, Misago, Zilver, Complete SE, EverFlex, Innova, Pulsar-18, LifeStent, S.M.A.R.T. Flex, and Supera) used to treat peripheral arterial disease (PAD) were subjected to axial tension, compression, three-point bending, and torsion tests, and the data on reaction forces and moments were compared with finite element simulations of the same experiments. Inverse computational analysis was used to determine austenite and martensite elasticity, transformation stretch, stresses at the start and end of transformation loading, and the start of transformation stress in compression. Uniaxial tensile tests were done on isolated struts from Absolute Pro and Zilver stents to verify the results of the inverse analysis. Our study demonstrate that Nitinol material properties are significantly different across devices. Austenite elasticity ranged 7.5-85 GPa, martensite elasticity 10-47.8 GPa, transformation stretch 1.03-1.08, the start of transformation loading stress 386-465 MPa, the end of transformation loading stress 411-535 MPa, and the start of transformation stress in compression 150-900 MPa. Nitinol of S.M.A.R.T. Control and S.M.A.R.T. Flex devices had the softest response, while Pulsar-18 had the hardest. The presented Nitinol mechanical properties of commonly used PAD stents can improve the fidelity of computational models investigating stent-artery interactions and may help improve clinical outcomes of endovascular PAD repairs through better device design.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.