ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025
Impact of plastic mulch on soil microbial abundance, activity, and diversity in the saline-alkali soils of Xinjiang.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Polyethylene Mulch Emissions Differentially Impact the Soil Metabolome and Microbial Community in Field Pea (Journal of xenobiotics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: As biodegradable plastic (BP) film gradually replaces traditional polyethylene (PE) film as an environmentally friendly alternative in agriculture, its impact on the soil microbial environment has attracted considerable attention. Methods: This study examined the effects of different film coverings on the quantity, activity, and diversity of soil microorganisms by comparing fully biodegradable films with thicknesses of 0.01 mm and 0.012 mm to conventional PE films in typical cotton fields of Xinjiang. Results: Results showed that the overall trends in microbial population dynamics were generally consistent across treatments. The abundance of bacteria and actinomycetes was highest under PE film, while fungi abundance peaked under the 0.012 mm BP film. With longer cultivation time, soil microorganisms exhibited a significant increase in total carbon source metabolism. Across the entire cotton growth period, different mulching treatments had only minor effects on microbial diversity. Both film cracking rates and the local environmental conditions emerged as key factors influencing the soil microbial community. Conclusions: Considering the need for a low cracking rate during the seedling stage as well as soil environmental sustainability, BP film with a thickness of 0.01mm appeared to be the most suitable degradable option for practical use in cotton fields. Nevertheless, comprehensive evaluation of its long-term environmental benefits will require further research and sustained monitoring in conjunction with cotton growth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.