ArticleHepatobiliary surgery and nutrition2025
Safety and learning curve of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy with limited robotic platform access: a propensity score-matched comparison with open surgery in a high-volume center.
Article in Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The learning curve of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy: a systematic review of learning curve assessment methodologies, proficiency thresholds, training pathways and clinical outcomes.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Robotic versus laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy across the learning curve: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Step-by-Step Hepatic Artery and Celiac Axis Dissection According to the Inoue Classification During Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Clinical Recommendations for Remote Robotic Assisted Surgery From the CRSA 2025 International Consensus Conference.World journal of surgery · 2026Article
- Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a structured narrative review of learning curve, patient selection, and program readiness.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- The breaking point in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: factors influencing conversion thresholds and early postoperative outcomes in a tertiary referral center.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Interest of the Robotic Approach for Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Elderly Patients in a Setting of Limited Robotic Platform Access: A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison with Open Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Do the simplest robotic procedures carry the highest morbidity?Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is a major surgical procedure that is still mostly performed via open approach [open PD (OPD)] since the laparoscopic approach (LA) is limited outside specialised centers. Robot-assisted PD (RPD) appears to decrease the difficulties associated with LA. However, previously published studies are partly biased because they stem from institutions with extensive access to robotic platforms (ARPs). The present study aims to analyse the safety of RPD compared with OPD and the specific learning curve when performed with limited ARP. Methods: This prospective single-center study was conducted in a high-volume pancreatic surgery center but with limited ARP between May 2018 and October 2023. Safety (primary endpoint: 90-day mortality) was assessed using propensity score matching (2:1) to compare RPD and OPD. The learning curve was evaluated using cumulative sum (CUSUM) control chart analysis (split into three consecutive periods of 20 patients), focusing on operative time and complications. Results: A total of 354 PD were analysed, of which 60 (17%) were RPD. A matched cohort of 120 OPD was used for comparison. The conversion rate was 15% in the RPD group. The 90-day mortality rate was 5% and 8.3% for RPD and OPD, respectively (P=0.55). The RPD learning curve showed a reduction in hospital stay (19.9 Conclusions: Even with limited ARP, setting up a robotic program for PD is feasible and safe but it requires a learning curve of 40 patients. During this initial phase, careful patient selection is mandatory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.