ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Machine learning-based prediction of response to Janus kinase inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using clinical data.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Use of Artificial Intelligence in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Advancements and Novel Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Toward causal artificial intelligence for biologic treatment response in rheumatoid arthritis: current evidence and future directions.Rheumatology international · 2026Review
- Biomarkers of treatment response in rheumatoid arthritis: from conventional markers to tissue immunophenotype.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease with considerable heterogeneity in treatment response, leaving many patients unable to achieve remission or low disease activity. We aimed to develop a machine learning model to predict which patients with moderate-to-severe RA would respond to Janus kinase inhibitor therapy, thereby facilitating more effective and personalized treatment strategies. Methods: We retrospectively collected data from the Korean College of Rheumatology Biologics therapy (KOBIO) registry and Asan Medical Centers, including adult patients with moderate or high disease activity (DAS28-ESR≥3.2) and at least 12 months of follow-up. We trained and validated gradient boosting machine-learning models (XGBoost) to predict whether patients would achieve low disease activity or remission after 6 months of Janus kinase inhibitor therapy, using prespecified baseline covariates and stratified splits for independent training and test datasets. Results: This study included 264 patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis from the Korean cohorts (the KOBIO registry and Asan Medical Centers). Of these, 247 received either tofacitinib (n=123) or baricitinib (n=124). After 6 months of treatment, 65% of patients on tofacitinib and 70% on baricitinib achieved low disease activity or remission. Our machine-learning models (trained and validated separately for each drug) achieved high predictive performance (tofacitinib: ROC-AUC 0.82, accuracy 80%; baricitinib: ROC-AUC 0·88, accuracy 88%), identifying key clinical factors such as total cholesterol, CRP, and specific joint swelling or tenderness for tofacitinib, and patient global assessment, joint swelling, and co-administration of hydroxychloroquine for baricitinib. Model-guided treatment selection could have improved outcomes for an additional 15% of patients by aligning each individual's predicted response with the more suitable Janus kinase inhibitor. Conclusion: The findings suggest that ML models can accurately predict treatment response to Janus kinase inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis and may support personalized therapy selection to improve clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.