Article in Exercise, sport & movement, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Bjoern HornikelDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0040-5473
Erin E DooleyDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Barbara SternfeldDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.
Stephen SidneyDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.
Cora E LewisDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
David R JacobsDivision of Epidemiology & Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Mercedes CarnethonDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Kelley Pettee GabrielDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Funding
CORONARY ARTERY RISK DEVELOPMENT IN YOUNG ADULTS (CARDIA) STUDY - COORDINATING CENTER (CC)75N92023D00002 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI LI, JING · 2023 to 2025
$6.8M
Young Adult and Midlife Transitions in Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior with Heart Failure Risk and Progression: Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA)R01HL149796 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI GABRIEL, KELLEY PETTEE · 2020 to 2023
$5.6M
CORONARY ARTERY RISK DEVELOPMENT IN YOUNG ADULTS (CARDIA) STUDY - OAKLAND FIELD CENTER75N92023D00003 · NHLBI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BHATT, ANKEET S. · 2023 to 2025
$2.2M
CORONARY ARTERY RISK DEVELOPMENT IN YOUNG ADULTS (CARDIA) STUDY - BIRMINGHAM FIELD CENTER75N92023D00005 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI LEWIS, CORA · 2023 to 2025
$2.2M
CORONARY ARTERY RISK DEVELOPMENT IN YOUNG ADULTS (CARDIA) STUDY - CHICAGO FIELD CENTERDIVERSITY SUPPLEMENT FOR MORGANN WEST75N92023D00004 · NHLBI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI CARNETHON, MERCEDES · 2023 to 2025
$2.1M
CORONARY ARTERY RISK DEVELOPMENT IN YOUNG ADULTS (CARDIA) STUDY - UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FIELD CENTER.75N92023D00006 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI SCHREINER, PAMELA J · 2023 to 2025
Introduction: Measuring maximal oxygen consumption Methods: Data include 580 Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) participants (55.9% female, 38.6% Black) who attended the year 35 exam (age 54-66 yr) and completed a GXT with gas analysis. Pearson correlation coefficients were computed between GXTd (seconds) and Results: Mean (standard deviation) GXTd and Conclusions: GXTd serves as a reliable measure of cardiorespiratory fitness in the absence of gas analysis, and a corresponding
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Validation of a Time-to-Exhaustion-Derived · full record | OpenQuestion