ArticleEngineering applications of artificial intelligence2026
Uncertainty- and hardness-weighted loss functions for medical image segmentation.
Article in Engineering applications of artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate segmentation of medical images is essential for various image processing tasks and is now predominantly achieved using deep learning techniques. However, existing approaches often employ loss functions that fail to account for pixel-level differences in prediction uncertainty or hardness. This limitation frequently results in relatively large segmentation errors, particularly in object boundary regions. To address the limitation, we developed a novel class of uncertainty- / hardness-weighted loss functions by introducing two distinct pixel-wise weighting schemes: probability-guided uncertainty (PGU) and region-enhanced hardness (REH) weights. These weights, derived from the differences between network predictions and their corresponding ground truths, were designed to emphasize challenging pixels while reducing segmentation uncertainties. We validated these loss functions by integrating them with two classical neural networks, i.e., Swin Transformer based U-shape network (Swin-Unet) and V-shape network (V-Net) to segment two- and three-dimensional target objects across four different images datasets, including Retinal Fundus Glaucoma Challenge (REFUGE) dataset, Retinal Vascular Tree Analysis (RETA) dataset, optical coherence tomography (OCT) dataset, and Atria Segmentation Challenge (ASC) dataset. Extensive experiments demonstrated that our developed loss functions outperformed classical losses, such as cross-entropy (CE) and Dice losses, along with their variants, highlighting the effectiveness and generalization of the introduced weighting schemes. The source code is available at https://github.com/wmuLei/uhLoss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.