ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Patterns of response of breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to molecular subtype.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive Value of CT-Derived Skeletal Muscle Metrics for Pathologic Complete Response in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.European journal of breast health · 2026Article
- A Predictive Immunological Signature Associated with Pathological Response in Breast Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Association of Post-Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy MRI andDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is a key component in the treatment of locally advanced breast cancer, with pathologic complete response (pCR) varying by molecular subtype. This study evaluates pCR rates following NACT in a Lebanese cohort, stratified by molecular and clinicopathological features.Methods: This retrospective cohort included 187 women with stage T1-T4, N1, M0 breast cancer treated at the American University of Beirut Medical Center between 2010 and 2016. Molecular subtypes (Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2-positive, triple-negative) were determined by immunohistochemistry and/or FISH. pCR was defined as ypT0N0. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of pCR.Results: The median age was 45 years. Molecular subtype distribution was: Luminal A (28.9%), Luminal B (45.5%), HER2-positive (11.8%), and triple-negative (13.9%). Overall pCR was achieved in 12.8% (24/187) of patients. pCR rates significantly differed across molecular subtypes: HER2-enriched 45.5%, Luminal B 11.8%, triple-negative 11.5%, and Luminal A 1.9% (p = 0.005). Axillary involvement was also significantly associated with pCR (p < 0.001), while clinical T stage, tumor grade, focality/centricity, and chemotherapy regimen showed no significant associations. In multivariable logistic regression, molecular subtype remained an independent predictor of pCR (p = 0.002). Conclusion: pCR rates varied markedly among molecular subtypes, being highest in HER2-enriched tumors and lowest in Luminal A. These findings support molecular subtype as a key determinant of treatment response and highlight its role in guiding neoadjuvant treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.