Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41383510›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Integrated liquid biopsy model for predicting metastasis and guiding PD-1 therapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Hailong Pang, Shenshen Hao, Shuiwang Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hailong PangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, General Hospital of China Pingmei Shenma Medical Group, Pingdingshan, China.
Shenshen HaoDepartment of Spinal Oncology, General Hospital of China Pingmei Shenma Medical Group, Pingdingshan, China.
Shuiwang HuGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Department of Pathophysiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study endeavors to develop and validate an integrated biomarker signature (IBS) grounded in serum carbohydrate antigen 72-4 (CA72-4), vascular endothelial growth factor-C (VEGF-C), and the pepsinogen I/II ratio (PGI/PGII). A practical IBS model will be constructed to substantially enhance the accuracy of lymph node metastasis (LNM) risk stratification following surgery for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). This model is anticipated to refine prognostic assessments for patients and to identify novel research avenues within the field, thereby providing guidance for both prognostic determination and future investigations. Methods: A prospective three-cohort design was adopted, encompassing a training cohort of 220 patients, a temporal validation cohort of 138 patients, and a regional external validation cohort of 94 patients. This design was selected for its robustness in ensuring the validity and reliability of the findings. A total of 452 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who underwent R0 resection were enrolled between March 2022 and June 2024. The predictive model was constructed using the XGBoost algorithm combined with Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) for interpretability. Model performance was evaluated via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, decision curve analysis, and net reclassification index. Results: The IBS model demonstrated superior discriminative ability in the training cohort ( Conclusion: The validated IBS model provides high-precision prediction of postoperative LNM risk in ESCC. It offers a novel framework (

Indexed as

esophageal squamous cell carcinomaintegrated biomarker signatureliquid biopsylymphnode metastasisPD-1 inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID41383510
PMCPMC12689415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.