Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41383438›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in drug safety2025

How LLMs can advance safety case intake-points to consider and insights from a proof of concept.

Hans-Joerg Roemming, Manfred Hauben, Wei Wannhoff, Claudia Schaffer, Irina Tihaa, Martin Heitmann, Veit Mengling

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in drug safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. How is AI developing in pharmacovigilance?Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hans-Joerg RoemmingMerck Healthcare KGaA, Frankfurter Straße 250, Darmstadt, Hessen 64293, Germany.
Manfred HaubenMerck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Hessen, Germany.
Wei WannhoffMerck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Hessen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2774-5395
Claudia SchafferMerck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Hessen, Germany.
Irina Tihaad-fine GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany.
Martin Heitmannd-fine GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany.
Veit Menglingd-fine GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7908-7759

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As per Good Pharmacovigilance Practices, pharmaceutical companies must act on potential adverse reactions to drugs. With significant increases in the number of case reports in recent years, they face pressure to raise the efficiency of their processes while maintaining data integrity and patient safety. The use of Large Language Models (LLMs) in safety case intake provides potential to advance processes without compromising quality. In this perspective review, we highlight the potential benefits of LLMs in case intake workflows, and points to consider relating to the current research landscape, inspired by our proof-of-concept (PoC) study. Benefits include raising the consistency of data extraction, reducing bias, and enhancing efficiency. We reflect on challenges in realizing the potential of this new technology from a practical industry perspective, namely (a) measuring the Return on Investment, (b) early involvement of subject matter experts, (c) handling unclear regulatory expectations, (d) system integration, and (e) organizational readiness. We illustrate the potential and its challenges through the lens of our PoC's insights as well as through insights from published literature, which allowed us to estimate an efficiency gain from a business process perspective for data extraction and initial case report, demonstrating the technology's potential and practical applicability in real-world scenarios.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecase intakecase processing workflowinnovationLarge Language Modelspatient safetypharmacovigilanceprocess integration

Identifiers

PMID41383438
PMCPMC12690072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.