Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41383432›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

AI technology adoption and intergenerational knowledge transfer among older employees.

Yanhong Guo, Li Wei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yanhong GuoSchool of Economic Management and Law, Jilin Normal University, Siping, China.
Li WeiSchool of Economic Management and Law, Jilin Normal University, Siping, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study employs the Job-Demands-Resources model and Conservation of Resources theory to examine the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) technology adoption on intergenerational knowledge transfer among older employees. It focuses on the psychological motivation underlying this phenomenon and identifies individual factors that affect intergenerational knowledge transfer. The purpose is to gain a deep understanding of the internal mechanisms of employee cognition and behavior change in the context of technological transformation. Methods: We surveyed 635 older employees from various industries in China and analyzed the data using SPSS 27.0, Mplus 8.3, and fsQCA 4.1. The data were analyzed via a moderated sequential mediation model to examine the relationships among AI technology adoption, identity threat, relational crafting, digital self-efficacy and intergenerational knowledge transfer, supplemented by fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA). The study tested the mediating effects of identity threat and relational crafting between AI technology adoption and intergenerational knowledge transfer, as well as the moderating role of digital self-efficacy. In addition, fsQCA was used to test antecedents of intergenerational knowledge transfer among older employees. Results: The findings indicate that AI technology adoption positively influences intergenerational knowledge transfer. Identity threat and relational crafting play mediating roles between AI technology adoption and intergenerational knowledge transfer and also serve as sequential mediators. Digital self-efficacy negatively moderates the impact of AI technology adoption on identity threat, thereby moderating both the mediating role of identity threat and the sequential mediating effect of identity threat and relational crafting. Additionally, fsQCA identified three antecedent configurations that trigger intergenerational knowledge transfer among older employees. Discussion: Prior research on AI technology adoption has tended to emphasize singular positive or negative impacts on specific variables. This study constructs a model that incorporates both positive and negative effects, elucidating the multifaceted mechanisms through which AI technology adoption influences intergenerational knowledge transfer and enriches research on the consequences of AI technology adoption. While existing literature often highlights negative psychological and behavioral impacts of AI technology adoption on older employees, the present findings show that AI technology adoption can significantly enhance intergenerational knowledge transfer among older employees, thereby complementing current findings. Finally, by adopting a configurational thinking, this study identifies multiple pathways through which various factors affect intergenerational knowledge transfer, providing a useful complement to single-factor analyses of AI technology adoption's impact. Thereby, the study offers practical insights for organizations seeking to develop inclusive technological-culture strategies.

Indexed as

AI technology adoptionidentity threatintergenerational knowledge transferolder employeesrelational crafting

Identifiers

PMID41383432
PMCPMC12689350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.