Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41383422›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2025

Investigation of the relationship between organizational cynicism and counterproductive work behaviors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aydın Çivilidağ, Şerife Durmaz, Berk Uslu

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aydın ÇivilidağDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Literary, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Türkiye.
Şerife DurmazDepartment of Labor Economics and Industrial Relations, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Türkiye.
Berk UsluDepartment of Labor Economics and Industrial Relations, Institute of Social Sciences, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of the research is to examine the effect size between organizational cynicism and counterproductive work behaviors, which are within the scope of negative employee attitudes and behaviors in working life, with the systematic review method. Methods: The systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. EBSCO, Google Scholar, SAGE, Scopus, WILEY and WoS databases were searched by the authors with the keywords "Organizational cynicism, employee cynicism, deviant work behaviors, workplace deviant behavior," "Counterproductive work behaviors," "employee's misbehavior" in English between 2010 and 2024. Results: The data set of the research consists of 22 empirical studies conducted in 9 different countries with 7,331 participants. According to the random effects model, the effect size was found 0.482 between organizational cynicism and counterproductive work behaviors. According to this result, a medium and significant effect size and a positive relationship ( Discussion: Organizations should consider that each employee is negatively affected by negative leadership behaviors, unfair and unequal organizational decisions and practices. Therefore, it can be said that equal, fair, supportive attitudes and organizational practices will reduce employees' organizational cynicism and counterproductive work behaviors and also positively affect their organizational commitment, job performance and organizational citizenship behaviors.

Indexed as

counterproductive work behaviorsmeta-analysisorganizational behaviorsorganizational cynicismwork life

Identifiers

PMID41383422
PMCPMC12689420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.