Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41383418›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Wealth comparison across social distances: implications for well-being.

Yingying Wu, Qinglan Tang, Zhongli Huang, Ziyu Liu, Kayan Liang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yingying Wu *Department of Business, University of Nottingham Ningbo China, Ningbo, China.
Qinglan Tang *Reading Academy, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, China.
Zhongli Huang *International College, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Ziyu Liu *Law School, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Kayan Liang *School of Business, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In today's digitally connected and economically unequal world, upward wealth comparisons are pervasive. This study examined how wealth comparisons across different social distances (family, friends, and internet) distinctly affect well-being. Methods: We employed a scenario-based questionnaire design to assess the effects of wealth comparisons. Data were analyzed using regression models, with stress tested as a mediator through mediation analysis and heterogeneous effects explored across subgroups based on help-seeking behaviors. Results: Comparisons with all three groups are associated with negative influence on well-being, with comparisons to friends exhibiting the strongest effect. Stress mediates these impacts, while help-seeking behaviors show divergent pathways. Additionally, life satisfaction and income buffer sensitivity to disparities. Discussion: The findings underscore that the risk of upward wealth comparisons is contingent on social distance. This research integrates offline and online dynamics into a cohesive theoretical framework, advancing social comparison theory and providing actionable insights for interventions designed to protect well-being in the face of pervasive social comparison.

Indexed as

help-seeking behaviorsocial distancesstresswealth comparisonwell-being

Identifiers

PMID41383418
PMCPMC12689371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.