ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2025
A machine learning-based predictive model for 48-week hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance in chronic hepatitis B patients treated with pegylated interferon α-2b: prediction at week 24.
Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Altered expression of MX2 and SAMD4A in PBMCs predicts early treatment responses in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients during Peg-IFN-α therapy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Construction and validation of a predictive model for HBsAg loss in chronic hepatitis B patients treated with Peg-IFNα-2b.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is an infectious disease mainly affecting the liver, caused by the hepatitis B virus (HBV). In the treatment of CHB, pegylated interferon α-2b (PEG-IFNα-2b) is one of the important therapeutic options. However, there are significant individual differences in patients' responses to this treatment and only a few patients can achieve hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance. Therefore, an effective method to identify patients with a high likelihood of favorable response at an early stage is urgently needed. Methods: In this study, we analyzed data from CHB patients who received antiviral treatment with PEG-IFNα-2b and completed 48 weeks of follow-up in the "OASIS" Project. Patients were divided into the seroclearance group and the non-seroclearance group based on whether HBsAg seroclearance was achieved at week 48.Five distinct machine learning feature selection algorithms were used to identify the optimal predictive variables for HBsAg seroclearance. These key variables were then incorporated into 12 machine learning algorithms to build predictive models for HBsAg seroclearance. The best-performing model was selected, and its performance was evaluated. Results: A total of 680 subjects were included in this study, comprising 165 in the 48-week seroclearance group and 515 in the 48-week non-seroclearance group. Through five different machine learning feature selection algorithms, 11 variables were identified and used to construct 12 distinct machine learning models. Comparative analysis of these models, based on the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC) and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA) results from the training set, indicated that the Random Forest model was the optimal model for predicting HBsAg seroclearance. Conclusion: The Random Forest model effectively predicted the 48-week HBsAg seroclearance rate using indicators measured at 24 weeks of PEG-IFNα-2b therapy. This model can provide a reliable reference for optimizing clinical treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.