ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025
Dissecting the difference between positive and negative brain health sentiment using X data.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Human behavior is significantly influenced by emotions, with negative sentiments such as fear and anxiety driving various coping mechanisms, including cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), dietary changes, and medication use. Social media platforms like X (formerly Twitter) offer valuable insights into these behaviors due to their real-time, user-generated content. While previous research has explored general sentiment on X (formerly Twitter), there has been limited focus on the reasons behind negative sentiments and the coping strategies employed, particularly in relation to brain health. Methods: We analyzed 390,000 X-posts tagged with #brain and #health, categorizing them into positive, negative, and neutral sentiments. We then investigate the use of CBT techniques, dietary adjustments, and specific medications across these sentiments. Results: Our findings reveal distinct patterns in how negative and positive sentiments are expressed and managed on social media. Negative sentiments are often linked to serious health concerns, such as COVID-19 and brain inflammation, and exhibit various cognitive distortions. These X-posts also mention coping strategies like using medications such as lorazepam and simvastatin, or consuming comfort foods like pizza. In contrast, positive sentiments emphasize resilience and improvement, with mentions of mindfulness, supplements, and medications like doxycycline and pregabalin. The study also highlights the risk of disseminating information about dietary and drug supplements that may not be suitable for public use due to serious side effects, such as Chaga mushrooms, which, despite being associated with positive sentiment, are known to cause renal failure in certain cases. Conclusion: Overall, the study profiles the use of positive and negative brain health sentiment of X, which underscores both the advantages and risks of using X (formerly Twitter) as a platform for sharing brain health-related information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.