ArticleNeuroprotection (Chichester, England)2024
A multicenter single-arm objective performance criteria trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of a dedicated venous sinus thrombectomy device for severe cerebral venous sinus thrombosis.
Article in Neuroprotection (Chichester, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A multicenter single-arm objective performance criteria trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of a dedicated venous sinus thrombectomy device for severe cerebral venous sinus thrombosis.Neuroprotection (Chichester, England) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Approximately 21% of patients with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) are refractory to anticoagulation treatment and face poor prognosis. These patients may benefit from endovascular therapy. Although numerous studies have reported promising results with endovascular therapy, it remains challenging to obtain convincing evidence of its efficacy and safety due to the unique challenges posed by CVST, such as larger vessel diameters, distinct pathophysiology, and substantial clot burden. Therefore, dedicated endovascular therapy tools should be developed specifically for CVST. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a dedicated venous sinus thrombectomy device in patients with acute or subacute CVST. Methods: This prospective, multicenter, single-arm trial utilized an objective performance criterion design. Enrolled patients received treatment with a dedicated venous sinus thrombectomy device to recanalize occluded sinuses or veins. The primary objective was to compare the immediate postoperative recanalization rate with a preset target value to determine whether the device met the clinical application needs. The trial plans to enroll 146 patients from 11 tertiary medical centers in China. Discussion: This trial is expected to fill a critical gap in endovascular treatments for CVST and support the development of reliable, dedicated thrombectomy devices for future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.