ReviewNeuroprotection (Chichester, England)2024
Blood-based biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease: Standardization and comprehensiveness.
Review in Neuroprotection (Chichester, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anti-Amyloid Antibodies in the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease: An Umbrella Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Discovery-Driven Plasma Proteomics Identifies a Multi-Protein Signature for Amyloid PET Positivity: A Machine Learning Analysis of the Bio-Hermes Cohort.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Integrative Analysis of Pharmacological and Non-pharmacological Interventions in Alzheimer's Dementia.Cureus · 2026Review
- Homogentisic Acid Disrupts the Blood-Brain Barrier and Promotes Aβ Aggregation in Alzheimer's Disease.Current medical science · 2026Article
- New Alzheimer's disease diagnostics and psychological clinical perspectives.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Recent molecular insights and biosensor-based diagnostic technologies for hyperphosphorylated Tau in Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2025Review
- Blood-based biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease: Standardization and comprehensiveness.Neuroprotection (Chichester, England) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Population aging is sweeping across the globe, resulting in a striking prevalence of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and dementia and a heavy economic burden. Given the time window of 10-20 years from pathological initiation to clinically detected cognitive impairment, early detection can significantly impact the prevention and control of AD. The invasiveness and high cost of cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers and positron emission tomography-computed tomography imaging limit large-scale disease screening. However, blood-based biomarkers (BBMs) lack these disadvantages, shedding light on their usefulness in the large-scale identification and prevention of AD. Prominent advancement has recently been made regarding BBMs of AD co-pathology (amyloid β, tau protein, neurofilament light polypeptide, and glial fibrillary acidic protein) to improve their accuracy as clinical diagnostics of AD to a level comparable to that of canonical methods, facilitating the large-scale clinical implementation of diagnostic tests with higher precision. To briefly summarize, the prospects of AD BBMs rely on standardization and comprehensiveness. Calibrating the sample collection procedure and clarifying the boundaries for indices and abnormalities are beneficial for constructing a canonical diagnostic assay. The comprehensive assembly of heterogeneous clinical evidence guarantees the accuracy of diagnosis and improves the workflow for early identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.