Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41383360›Full record

ArticleJournal of hepatocellular carcinoma2025

Impact of Middle Hepatic Vein Resection During Hemihepatectomy on Surgical Outcomes and Long-Term Prognosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study.

Wan-Ling Luo, Qing-Bo Wang, Yu-Kai Li, Yu-Bo Liang, Jin Li, Xing-Ming Chen, Yawhan Lakang, Zi-Sheng Yang, Jin-Xiang Zuo, Wei Wang and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Wan-Ling Luo *Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0009-1540-719X
Qing-Bo Wang *Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0000-3360-0860
Yu-Kai Li *Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.
Yu-Bo Liang *Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-6897-5072
Jin Li *Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.
Xing-Ming Chen *Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.
Yawhan Lakang *Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.
Zi-Sheng Yang *Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.
Jin-Xiang Zuo *Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0001-5704-0041
Wei Wang *Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.
Shuang-Xi LiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.
Yang KeDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-6560-5180

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of middle hepatic vein (MHV) resection during hemihepatectomy on short-term surgical outcomes and long-term prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients and Methods: Patients with HCC at Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stages 0-B who underwent hemihepatectomy between January 2016 and December 2022 were retrospectively screened. They were categorized into the MHV-preserved and MHV-resected groups. Intraoperative parameters, postoperative complications, liver function, overall survival (OS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared. Cox regression analyses were used to identified independent risk factors for OS and RFS. Results: A total of 137 patients were included, of whom 107 (78.1%) had MHV preserved and 30 (21.9%) had MHV resected. Compared with MHV preservation, MHV resection was associated with a longer operative time (329.9 ± 108.0 vs 291.4 ± 88.9 min, Conclusion: MHV resection during hemihepatectomy increases operative time, blood loss, and postoperative liver enzyme levels, but does not significantly impact long-term survival in patients with HCC.

Indexed as

hepatic veinliver cancerliver functionliver resectionsurvival

Identifiers

PMID41383360
PMCPMC12689434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.