ArticleHealth science reports2025
Comparative Effectiveness of Insulin Versus Oral Hypoglycemic Agents in Diabetic Patients With Acute Stroke: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Analysis of Treatment Outcomes and Influencing Factors.
Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phytochemical and Preliminary Biological Evaluation ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparative Effectiveness of Insulin Versus Oral Hypoglycemic Agents in Diabetic Patients With Acute Stroke: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Analysis of Treatment Outcomes and Influencing Factors.Health science reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Diabetes is a disease that presents numerous challenges for both patients and physicians. Researching the factors associated with this condition is essential in today's medical studies. This study aims to determine the type of therapeutic regimen-either insulin or oral hypoglycemic agents-used in diabetic patients who have experienced an acute stroke. Methods: This descriptive-comparative study focused on diabetic patients who were referred to Valiasr Hospital in Zanjan in 2021 due to an acute stroke. Out of the initial statistical population, 248 individuals were evaluated using a demographic questionnaire and a checklist. After excluding incomplete questionnaires, a total of 176 participants were included in the analysis. The data were entered into SPSS v.26 for statistical analysis, which involved both descriptive methods (mean, standard deviation, frequency, and percentage) and inferential methods ( Results: The findings of this study indicate that patients' conditions-assessed through MRS, MRS post-discharge, NIHSS, atrial fibrillation rhythm, sex, stroke location, and type of stroke-were not significantly associated with the treatment regimens, whether insulin or oral medications. However, as age increased, the amount of insulin used compared to oral medications showed a significant rise. Conclusion: Our findings indicated that diabetic patients who received insulin had a similar risk of acute stroke compared to those treated with oral medications. However, research shows that diet therapy plays a significant role in the management and progression of diabetes. Therefore, further studies in this area are needed to address the potential negative consequences of ischemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.