ArticleTH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis2025
Pharmacokinetic Evidence Supporting Subcutaneous Use of Protein C Concentrate in Patients with Protein C Deficiency.
Article in TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Protein C concentrate (Ceprotin®; Baxalta US Inc., a Takeda company, Cambridge, MA; Takeda Manufacturing Austria AG, Vienna, Austria) is approved for intravenous (IV) use in severe congenital protein C deficiency (SCPCD), with pharmacokinetic (PK)-guided dosing. Subcutaneous (SC) administration may reduce treatment burden, especially for pediatric and neonatal patients; however, the use of SC protein C concentrate has so far been empirical, and PK data are required to support dose optimization. Objectives: This study aimed to characterize the population PK (PopPK) of SC protein C concentrate in patients with SCPCD. Methods: A PopPK model was developed for SC protein C concentrate, based on a previously developed model for IV administration. Simulations were conducted across eight three-stage dosing scenarios that patterned the IV dosing regimens in the U.S. product label (initial dose [stage 1]: 60-120 IU/kg; subsequent three doses [stage 2]: 60-80 IU/kg every 6 hours; maintenance dose [stage 3]: 45-120 IU/kg every 12 hours). Additional simulations were performed across six one-stage dosing scenarios that were based on dosing reported in clinical practice (50-60 IU/kg every 12 hours, 200-350 IU/kg every 48 hours). Target maximum ( Results: The dataset included 86 observations from 13 patients with SCPCD receiving SC protein C concentrate. Model-based simulations predicted that, after the first dose, 6-9% and 5-45% of patients in the three- and one-stage dosing scenarios, respectively, would attain Conclusions: The PopPK model was robust and described SC protein C concentrate PK data well. Evidence provided by model-based simulations supports the use of various SC dosing regimens across age groups in acute or prophylactic settings according to the intended protein C activity levels. A high loading dose may be required to rapidly attain target therapeutic concentrations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.