Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41383331›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in public health2025

From pandemics to preparedness: harnessing AI, CRISPR, and synthetic biology to counter biosecurity threats.

Michael Ben Okon, Okechukwu Paul-Chima Ugwu, Chinyere Nneoma Ugwu, Fabian Chukwudi Ogenyi, Dominic Terkimbi Swase, Chinyere Nkemjika Anyanwu, Val Hyginus Udoka Eze, Jovita Nnenna Ugwu, Saheed Adekunle Akinola, Regan Mujinya and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Michael Ben OkonDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Kampala International University, Ishaka, Uganda.
Okechukwu Paul-Chima UgwuDepartment of Publication and Extension, Kampala International University, Ishaka, Uganda.
Chinyere Nneoma UgwuDepartment of Publication and Extension, Kampala International University, Ishaka, Uganda.
Fabian Chukwudi OgenyiDepartment of Publication and Extension, Kampala International University, Ishaka, Uganda.
Dominic Terkimbi SwaseDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Kampala International University, Ishaka, Uganda.
Chinyere Nkemjika AnyanwuDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Kampala International University, Ishaka, Uganda.
Val Hyginus Udoka EzeDepartment of Electrical, Telecommunication and Computer Engineering, Kampala International University, Ishaka, Uganda.
Jovita Nnenna UgwuDepartment of Publication and Extension, Kampala International University, Ishaka, Uganda.
Saheed Adekunle AkinolaDepartment of Microbiology and Parasitology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Rwanda, Butare, Rwanda.
Regan MujinyaDepartment of Physiology, Equator University of Science and Technology, Masaka, Uganda.
Emeka Godson AnyanwuDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Kampala International University, Kampala, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biosecurity threats, which include natural outbreaks, laboratory accidents, and intentional bioterrorism, are a major issue for global health security. The impact of poor preparedness on the health, social, and economic effects of the 1918 influenza pandemic, the 2001 anthrax attacks, and the COVID-19 crisis is devastating. Standard methods, such as quarantine and serology, as well as traditional inoculations, offered basic defences but were often reactive, slow, and unfair. The recent scientific and technological progress has altered the concept of biosecurity preparedness by providing new instruments of early detection, quick reaction, and fair health solutions. Artificial intelligence-based epidemic prediction, next-generation sequencing, CRISPR-based diagnostics, and digital epidemiology are emerging technologies that enable near-real-time surveillance. New therapeutic agents and vaccines, such as mRNA and DNA platforms, monoclonal antibodies, and nanobody therapies, have enhanced response capabilities. Containment measures based on robotics, biosensors, nanotechnology-based PPE, and portable biocontainment units have simultaneously improved frontline safety. Sensitive health information and enhanced coordination are today secured with the help of digital and cyber-biosecurity tools. Nonetheless, the innovations have ethical, legal, and equity issues, which point to the need to govern responsibly and make them accessible to all. This review brings forth the incorporation of emerging technologies with international cooperation, fair systems, and responsive policies as the keys to developing resilient and future-orientated systems that could help alleviate natural, accidental, and intentional biosecurity threats.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBiosecurityBioterrorismCivil DefensePandemicsSynthetic BiologyCOVID-19Global HealthHumansantimicrobial resistancebiosecurity threatsdigital healthglobal collaborationglobal health preparednesssurveillance systems

Identifiers

PMID41383331
PMCPMC12689540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.