ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Evaluating the coupling coordination between Healthy Beijing initiative and economic development.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: Health and economic development are pivotal elements underpinning societal progress, with intricate mutual influences. Under China's "Healthy China" Initiative, the "Healthy Beijing Initiative" plays a crucial role in promoting coordinated health-economic development in the capital. This study aims to evaluate the coupling coordination between the Healthy Beijing Initiative and economic development in Beijing from 2020 to 2023, addressing imbalances and spatial disparities in their interactive development. Methods: The study employed the Global Entropy Value Method for dynamic indicator weighting and the Coupling Coordination Degree (CCD) model to measure system interactions. Municipal and district-level data were used: health indicators were sourced from the Healthy Beijing Initiative Monitoring Report, and socioeconomic metrics from the Beijing Statistical Yearbook. ArcGIS was applied to visualize spatial variations in coupling coordination levels across 16 districts, with quantitative disparity indicators (coefficient of variation [CV], extreme ratio) used to analyze regional gaps. Results: The overall coupling coordination degree (D) showed an upward trend, transitioning from "basic coordination" (D = 0.68) in 2020 to "intermediate coordination" (D = 0.714) in 2023, driven by synergies between health infrastructure investments and economic policies. Subsystem analysis revealed disparities: health status (D = 0.748) and services (D = 0.726) maintained sustained "intermediate coordination," while health security (D = 0.683) and environment (D = 0.665) lagged due to volatile resource allocation and persistent environmental challenges. Spatially, core urban districts (e.g., Xicheng, D > 0.9) achieved "high-quality coordination," contrasting with exurban areas (e.g., Pinggu, D < 0.5) plagued by infrastructure gaps and health-economic decoupling. Conclusion: Targeted policies are required to address subsystem imbalances (especially in health security and environmental governance) and spatial inequities. This study provides empirical evidence for integrated health-economic planning in megacities. Limitations include a 4-year data span and reliance on quantitative metrics; future research should extend the study period and integrate qualitative analyses to deepen insights.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.