ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Evaluation of the epidemiological and economic impact of the ADLIFE intervention on medium- to long-term in patients with advanced chronic disease.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Application of emerging information technologies in the prevention and control of chronic diseases.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Patients with advanced chronic disease (ACD) experience transitions in their clinical stability, leading to increased healthcare resource use and costs. EU-funded ADLIFE digital intervention aimed to ensure their quality of life through individualised care plans, clinical decision-making support, and patient empowerment. This study assessed the impact and sustainability of ADLIFE. Materials and methods: Target population included patients aged ≥55 years with heart failure (HF) and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). First, a discrete event simulation (DES) model was developed using data from Osakidetza-Basque Health Service to represent the natural history of the disease. Second, ADLIFE intervention was implemented in four pilot sites: Spain, England, Israel and Denmark. Intervention effect was quantified by comparing resource use between control and intervention groups. Finally, a budget impact analysis (BIA) was conducted by extrapolating the burden of the disease to 2030 under two scenarios: conventional and ADLIFE. Results: ADFLIFE intervention involved 370 patients (185 intervention, 185 control). Emergency visits and consultations with primary care professionals decreased significantly, while specialist consultations increased. Depending on the pilot site, projections estimated that ACD prevalence will increase by 37-50% by 2030, increasing associated costs. Under the ADLIFE scenario, the burden of the disease could be reduced by 1-2%, resulting in cumulative savings of €4-58 million. Discussion: Projections indicated a major challenge ahead due to a rise in ACD prevalence, highlighting the need for timely and effective healthcare responses. ADLIFE improved patient care and resource management, and its adoption could help reduce the disease burden and generate sustained long-term savings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.