Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41383271›Full record

ArticleRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health2025

[Nursing consultations in primary health care in Brazil: distribution and productivity in the management of chronic noncommunicable diseasesConsultas atendidas por personal de enfermería en la atención primaria de salud en Brasil: distribución y productividad en las consultas relativas a enfermedades crónicas no transmisibles].

Isabel Amélia Costa Mendes, Emerson Willian Santos de Almeida, Ítalo Rodolfo Silva, Elaine Maria Leite Rangel de Andrade, Rodrigo Magri Bernardes, Rodrigo Guimarães Dos Santos Almeida, Elizimara Ferreira Siqueira, Manoel Carlos Neri da Silva, Simone de Godoy

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Isabel Amélia Costa MendesUniversidade de São Paulo Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto São Paulo Brasil Universidade de São Paulo. Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brasil.
Emerson Willian Santos de AlmeidaUniversidade de São Paulo Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto São Paulo Brasil Universidade de São Paulo. Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brasil.
Ítalo Rodolfo SilvaUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Macaé Rio de Janeiro Brasil Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Macaé, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
Elaine Maria Leite Rangel de AndradeUniversidade Federal do Piauí Campus Universitário Ministro Petrônio Portela. Teresina Piauí Brasil Universidade Federal do Piauí. Campus Universitário Ministro Petrônio Portela. Teresina, Piauí, Brasil.
Rodrigo Magri BernardesUniversidade de São Paulo Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto São Paulo Brasil Universidade de São Paulo. Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brasil.
Rodrigo Guimarães Dos Santos AlmeidaUniversidade de São Paulo Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto São Paulo Brasil Universidade de São Paulo. Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brasil.
Elizimara Ferreira SiqueiraPrefeitura Municipal de Florianópolis. Florianópolis Santa Catarina Brasil Prefeitura Municipal de Florianópolis. Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brasil.
Manoel Carlos Neri da SilvaConselho Federal de Enfermagem Brasília, DF Brasil Conselho Federal de Enfermagem, Brasília, DF, Brasil.
Simone de GodoyUniversidade de São Paulo Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto São Paulo Brasil Universidade de São Paulo. Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brasil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To investigate nurses' contribution to tackling chronic noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) in primary health care (PHC) settings in Brazil. Methods: Ecological study using secondary data from the Primary Care Health Information System ( Results: In 2023, PHC nurses provided more than 30 million consultations related to NCDs. The highest rates were observed in the Northeast (for hypertension and diabetes) and in the South (for cancer screening). Nationwide, the average productivity was 314.8 consultations per nurse, with the highest number of nurses per 100,000 population seen in the South (58.6) and Northeast (51.0) regions. Conclusion: Nursing plays a strategic role in providing NCD management in PHC settings. Our findings suggest a strong contribution by nurses to coverage and screening of chronic diseases, but with marked regional inequalities. This reiterates the importance of investing in clinical protocols, infrastructure, and continuous training to expand equitable access to quality health care.

Indexed as

Brazilefficiencyhealth workforcenoncommunicable diseasesnursingprimary health care

Identifiers

PMID41383271
PMCPMC12693729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.