ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Administration of eptifibatide as rescue therapy during mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The success of the technical implementation of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) depends on many factors. Considering the experience of the interventional radiologist and the anatomical vascular differences of individual patients, it has technical limits. In our group, we focused on verifying the effectiveness and safety of eptifibatide intra-arterial administration when a sufficient degree of recanalization was not achieved with standard instruments. Methods: The study included 1,350 patients who underwent MT between 2008 and 2022. Neurological deficit was assessed with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and clinical outcome with modified Rankin scale (mRS). Presence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) was assessed according to the SITS-MOST criteria. In some patients, eptifibatide was administered in the case of insufficient recanalization or in the case of an acute periprocedural tendency to reocclusion. Achieved recanalization using the Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction scale (TICI). Results: Eptifibatide was administered during the procedure to 181 patients (age 67.8 ± 12.2 years, 57.5% men). In the eptifibatide group, successful recanalization (≥TICI2b) was achieved in 80.1%, the incidence of ICH was 21.6% and SICH 3.9%. In the group without eptifibatide, successful recanalization was achieved in 80.5%, ICH 19.9% and SICH 5.2%. Conclusion: The use of eptifibatide is an effective and safe procedure in technically more difficult cases of MT. It enables a similar degree of recanalization to be achieved without increasing the risk of SICH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.