ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
SAFE-CGRP study: multicenter retrospective evaluation of the safety of CGRP pathway-targeting monoclonal antibodies in migraine with relevant comorbidities or conditions excluded from trials.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Long-term safety of CGRP pathway inhibitors in migraine patients with prior cerebrovascular or cardiovascular disease.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Response to Galcanezumab in a Patient with Complex Neuropsychiatric Comorbidity: A Case Report.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Predictive factors of response to anti-CGRP pathway drugs in people with multiple sclerosis.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) have shown efficacy in the treatment of migraine. However, certain comorbidities have been excluded from clinical trials or may pose potential risks, despite not being formal contraindications. This study aimed to assess the safety of anti-CGRP or anti-CGRP receptor mAbs in real-world patients with such conditions. Methods: A retrospective multicenter study was conducted across 11 headache units in Spain. Patients with relevant or trial-excluded comorbidities who received at least one anti-CGRP or anti-CGRP receptor mAb were included. Results: Of 2,042 evaluated patients, 353 had at least one comorbidity. The mean treatment duration was 12.7 months [standard deviation (SD) = 8 months]. A total of 53 conditions were included: 202 had autoimmune diseases, 163 presented vascular risk factors or diseases [body mass index (BMI) > 30: 15.2%, diabetes: 5.38%, stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA): 3.08%, cardiac ischaemic disease: 1.44%], of which 23 had moderate-to-high cardiovascular risk (Framingham scale); 23 had pulmonary diseases, 71 had a history of cancer, 12 were immunosuppressed, and 16 had other conditions. In 12% of cases, disease control was suboptimal after treatment initiation, without a causal relationship to the mAb. A possible treatment-related worsening was observed in 14 cases: four with arterial hypertension worsening, seven with Raynaud's syndrome, two with arthritis flares, and one hereditary angioedema; all improved upon treatment discontinuation. No severe adverse events were reported. Discussion: In this study, treatment with monoclonal antibodies acting on the CGRP pathway showed a favorable safety profile in patients with complex clinical conditions not represented in clinical trials, with no serious adverse events observed during extended follow-up. These findings support their use in real-world clinical settings, although further studies are needed to confirm their long-term safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.