ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2025
An all-in-one workflow for emergency hippocampal-avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy in brain metastases, with optional online adaptive extension.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An all-in-one workflow for emergency hippocampal-avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy in brain metastases, with optional online adaptive extension.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBrain metastases (BMs), among the most prevalent intracranial malignant tumors, frequently induce acute symptoms such as headaches and motor deficits due to elevated intracranial pressure. Although hippocampal-avoidance whole brain radiotherapy (HA-WBRT) has demonstrated superior preservation of cognitive function compared to standard WBRT-despite comparable intracranial progression-free survival and overall survival outcomes-its clinical application remains restricted by the complexity and time-intensive nature of conventional planning and delivery protocols. These limitations hinder its utility as an emergent intervention for patients requiring urgent symptom relief. PURPOSE: To address this challenge, we developed a novel HA-WBRT-specific all-in-one (AIO) radiotherapy integrated with online adaptive techniques, and systematically evaluated its operational feasibility, dosimetric precision, and therapeutic effectiveness for emergency HA-WBRT in patients with BMs through preliminary clinical outcomes and related findings.
methodsThe HA-WBRT-specific AIO workflow featured by rapid auto-segmentation of the target and hippocampal, HA-constrained planning using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with three coplanar lock-field full arcs ache ensuring a high first-pass success rate for treatment plans, and real-time in vivo quality assurance (QA) enabling safe beam delivery without delay was applied to the eleven emergency patients with BMs receiving HA-WBRT during their initial treatment fraction. Rotational setup errors in subsequent fractions were documented. For these fractions, online adaptive radiotherapy (ART) was implemented using the AIO-generated plan as the baseline. Time requirements for each workflow step and in vivo 3D gamma passing rates were analyzed to evaluate efficiency and dosimetric accuracy. Dosimetric differences between the ART-optimized plan (ART-Plan) and the image-guided radiotherapy plan (IGRT-Plan) were compared to quantify the impact of rotational deviations on dose distribution. Cognitive function (via the Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE]) and functional independence (via the Basic Activities of Daily Living, BADL) were assessed before and after radiotherapy.
resultsThe average duration of the AIO radiotherapy was 24.3 ± 0.6 min. The majority of AIO-Plan parameters satisfied RTOG 0933 criteria. For the AIO-Plans, in vivo 3D γ pass rates exceeded 94% (3 mm/3% gamma criteria with a 10% dose threshold). Recorded rotational errors in emergency patients exhibited irregular and substantial variations, highlighting the need for online adaptation. Notably, 94% of fractions required adaptation to meet the target coverage (TC) criteria specified by NRG CC001. All ART-Plans demonstrated 3D γ pass rates exceeding 93% (3 mm/3% gamma criteria with a 10% dose threshold). The average duration of ART was 22.9 ± 1.6 min. Post-radiotherapy, both MMSE and BADL scores showed measurable improvements, while acute symptoms were effectively controlled and alleviated.
conclusionsThe AIO workflow for managing emergency patients with BMs is feasible and safe, facilitating prompt initiation of highly efficient radiotherapy during the first treatment session, eliminating delays. Subsequent online ART effectively corrects rotational deviations, ensuring adequate prescription dose coverage of target volumes while optimizing dose distribution to normal tissues. HA-WBRT incorporating the AIO workflow with online adaptation demonstrates potential for timely control and alleviation of acute symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.