Observational studyThoracic cancer2025
Extended Follow-Up Analysis of First-Line Atezolizumab in Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Real-World Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.
Observational study in Thoracic cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe previously reported the short-term real-world effectiveness and safety of first-line atezolizumab combined with chemotherapy in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). This study provides an updated analysis of the effectiveness, prognostic factors, and subsequent treatment patterns in first-line immunochemotherapy.
methodsThis prospective multicenter observational study enrolled patients with ES-SCLC, diagnosed at seven university hospitals throughout Korea, between June 2021 and August 2022. Primary outcomes were 1-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), whereas secondary outcomes included OS, objective response rate, disease control rate, second progression-free survival, and safety, evaluated based on established clinical guidelines.
resultsA total of 100 ES-SCLC patients (median age, 69 years) were enrolled, with a median follow-up duration of 26.0 months. The median PFS and OS were 6.2 and 17.1 months, respectively, with a 1-year OS rate of 62.5%. Favorable prognostic factors for OS included partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD) as the best responses (SD: hazard ratio (HR), 0.79; PR: HR, 0.38) and a longer platinum-free interval (HR 0.84). Brain radiotherapy significantly improved OS in patients with brain metastases, whereas thoracic radiotherapy during first-line treatment tended to prolong survival in patients who responded to systemic treatment. Patients receiving second-line treatment after progression presented a significantly longer OS than did those receiving only best supportive care.
conclusionThis study outlined the real-world effectiveness and safety of first-line atezolizumab immunochemotherapy for ES-SCLC patients over an extended follow-up, noting that local treatment and post-progression therapy were associated with improved survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.