Observational studyThe Libyan journal of medicine2025
Carotid Doppler and IVC metrics for volume and mortality assessment in septic shock.
Observational study in The Libyan journal of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The utility of carotid artery Doppler flow velocity (CADFV) over mortality is not well known. This study investigated the utility of bedside ultrasound in assessing volume status and predicting mortality in patients with septic shock with CADFV, the inferior vena cava collapse index, and the central venous pressure (CVP). This prospective observational study included adults admitted to the ED with septic shock, defined by hypotension (SBP < 90 mmHg or MAP < 65 mmHg) and evidence of end-organ hypoperfusion. Patient demographics, CVP, CADFV, inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter, inferior vena cava collapsibility index (IVCCI), and outcomes were recorded. Measurements are compared in terms of mortality. The mean age was 67 years, with a 57% mortality rate. ROC analysis revealed that CADFV predicted mortality with a sensitivity of 72% and a specificity of 68% at a cutoff of 50 cm/s. The IVCCI had 93% sensitivity and 85% specificity at a cutoff of 54.5%. The CVP had 61% sensitivity and 71% specificity at a cutoff of 1.5 mm H₂O. The mean IVCCI was 59%, and the mean CVP was 2.4 mmH₂O. The mean IVCCI was 59%, and the mean CVP was 2.4 mmH₂O. The deceased patients had a mean IVCCI of 63% and a mean CVP of 1.62 mmH₂O, whereas discharged patients had a mean IVCCI of 55% and a mean CVP of 3.45 mmH₂O. CADFV, IVCCI, and CVP can be used in evaluating the volume status and predicting mortality in septic shock. These noninvasive measures provide alternatives to invasive methods and facilitate timely intervention in emergency care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.