Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41383080›Full record

Observational studyThe Libyan journal of medicine2025

Carotid Doppler and IVC metrics for volume and mortality assessment in septic shock.

Rukiye Kaymakçı, Volkan Arslan, Ahmet Aksan, Mehmet Ali Karaca

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The Libyan journal of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rukiye KaymakçıArnavutkoy State Hospital, Istanbul, Turkiye.
Volkan ArslanEmergency Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkiye.
Ahmet AksanEmergency Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkiye.
Mehmet Ali KaracaEmergency Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-0876-2811

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The utility of carotid artery Doppler flow velocity (CADFV) over mortality is not well known. This study investigated the utility of bedside ultrasound in assessing volume status and predicting mortality in patients with septic shock with CADFV, the inferior vena cava collapse index, and the central venous pressure (CVP). This prospective observational study included adults admitted to the ED with septic shock, defined by hypotension (SBP < 90 mmHg or MAP < 65 mmHg) and evidence of end-organ hypoperfusion. Patient demographics, CVP, CADFV, inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter, inferior vena cava collapsibility index (IVCCI), and outcomes were recorded. Measurements are compared in terms of mortality. The mean age was 67 years, with a 57% mortality rate. ROC analysis revealed that CADFV predicted mortality with a sensitivity of 72% and a specificity of 68% at a cutoff of 50 cm/s. The IVCCI had 93% sensitivity and 85% specificity at a cutoff of 54.5%. The CVP had 61% sensitivity and 71% specificity at a cutoff of 1.5 mm H₂O. The mean IVCCI was 59%, and the mean CVP was 2.4 mmH₂O. The mean IVCCI was 59%, and the mean CVP was 2.4 mmH₂O. The deceased patients had a mean IVCCI of 63% and a mean CVP of 1.62 mmH₂O, whereas discharged patients had a mean IVCCI of 55% and a mean CVP of 3.45 mmH₂O. CADFV, IVCCI, and CVP can be used in evaluating the volume status and predicting mortality in septic shock. These noninvasive measures provide alternatives to invasive methods and facilitate timely intervention in emergency care.

Indexed as

Carotid ArteriesShock, SepticUltrasonography, DopplerVena Cava, InferiorAgedAged, 80 and overBlood Flow VelocityCentral Venous PressureFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityBedside ultrasoundcarotid doppler flow velocityemergency medicineseptic shockvolume assessment

Identifiers

PMID41383080
PMCPMC12704133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.