ArticleClinical transplantation2025
Drone-Assisted Organ Transport: A Scoping Review of Clinical, Regulatory, and System Readiness.
Article in Clinical transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Organ transport via drones: A cold chain Indian innovation.The Indian journal of medical research · 2026Article
- Drone-delivered automated external defibrillators in prehospital emergency care: implementation evidence, bottlenecks, and conceptual integration with artificial intelligence and next-generation communications.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Drone-Assisted Organ Transport: A Scoping Review of Clinical, Regulatory, and System Readiness.Clinical transplantation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Organ transport remains a critical determinant of transplant success, with delays during transfer prolonging cold ischemia time (CIT) and increasing the risk of delayed graft function or organ discard. Uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs) have emerged as a potential means to enhance the speed, predictability, and resilience of transplant logistics. This scoping review synthesized global evidence from 2010 to 2025 across biomedical, engineering, and regulatory domains, mapping research within six key themes: time sensitivity and clinical evidence, integration with preservation and perfusion technologies, technological and infrastructural readiness, regulatory and ethical frameworks, economic and environmental feasibility, and public and professional preparedness. Case studies from North America, Europe, and Asia demonstrate that UAVs can safely deliver donor organs while maintaining temperature and structural stability, with successful clinical transplantation reported. Their current value lies primarily in short-range transfers where direct routing and rapid handover are feasible; however, advances in heavy-lift aircraft, autonomous traffic management, and connected perfusion systems may soon enable longer, more complex missions. Major barriers include restrictions on beyond-visual-line-of-sight (BVLOS) operation, payload and endurance limitations, uncertain liability frameworks, and incomplete hospital-side infrastructure. Future priorities include comparative clinical and economic trials, harmonized international standards, and certified medical air corridors integrated with national allocation systems. With appropriate regulation, interoperability, and clinical validation, drones could become a safe and sustainable extension of existing transplant networks-improving efficiency, equity, and ultimately, patient survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.