Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41383043›Full record

ArticleDisaster medicine and public health preparedness2025

Cytogenetic Effects of Conventional and Ultra High Dose Rates of Radiation in Human Lymphocytes: Comparative Analysis in Metaphase Chromosomes and G2-PCCs.

Maria B Escalona, Terri L Ryan, Samantha R Gross, Carol J Iddins, Helen C Turner, Adayabalam S Balajee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Disaster medicine and public health preparedness, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maria B EscalonaCytogenetic Biodosimetry Laboratory, Radiation Emergency Assistance Center/Training Site, https://ror.org/040vxhp34Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
Terri L RyanCytogenetic Biodosimetry Laboratory, Radiation Emergency Assistance Center/Training Site, https://ror.org/040vxhp34Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
Samantha R Grosshttps://ror.org/00xzqjh13University of Tennessee Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Carol J IddinsCytogenetic Biodosimetry Laboratory, Radiation Emergency Assistance Center/Training Site, https://ror.org/040vxhp34Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7777-3760
Helen C TurnerCenter for Radiological Research, College of Physicians and Surgeons, https://ror.org/01esghr10Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Adayabalam S BalajeeCytogenetic Biodosimetry Laboratory, Radiation Emergency Assistance Center/Training Site, https://ror.org/040vxhp34Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.

Funding

Basic Energy Sciences F-114559National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases F-114558
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesUltra-high dose rate (UHDR) radiation, popularly known as FLASH, has been demonstrated to selectively kill tumor cells with minimal or negligible effects on normal cells but the biological effects induced by UHDR are not fully understood.

methodsIn this study, cytogenetic damage induced by UHDR radiation was compared with conventional dose rate (CDR) in human peripheral blood lymphocytes. Human blood samples were irradiated with 3 Gy and 8 Gy doses using 9 MeV electrons at 2 different dose rates: CDR 1 Gy/min and UHDR 600 Gy/Sec. Unstable and stable chromosomal aberrations were detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).

resultsReduced yields of chromosomal aberrations were observed after UHDR radiation at both radiation doses and the extent of reduction was more in colcemid arrested metaphase chromosomes than in G2-PCCs.

conclusionsThe reduced yields of chromosomal aberrations detected after UHDR of electrons may be due to rapid delivery of radiation dose within seconds, resulting in a non-uniform exposure of lymphocytes with varying levels of DNA damage induction. Future studies using well defined human equivalent in vivo and in vitro model systems are required to determine the underlying mechanisms for the FLASH effects.

Indexed as

Chromosome AberrationsLymphocytesMetaphaseAdultDose-Response Relationship, RadiationHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceRadiation Dosagecalyculin A induced prematurely condensed chromosomeschromosomal aberrationsfluorescence in situ hybridizationhuman lymphocytesmetaphase chromosomesultra-high dose rate radiation

Identifiers

PMID41383043
PMCPMC12926731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.