ArticleJournal of food science2025
Investigation of Flavor and Functional Properties of Diverse Yellow Pea Ingredients for Pan Bread Applications.
Article in Journal of food science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Investigation of Flavor and Functional Properties of Diverse Yellow Pea Ingredients for Pan Bread Applications.Journal of food science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Yellow peas (YPs) are a promising source of sustainable plant proteins however, characteristic off-flavors limit consumer acceptance and hinder their use as value-added food ingredients. This study evaluated the compositional and sensory characteristics of fourteen processed YP ingredients to determine their suitability in pan breads. Nine protein isolates (YPIs), three protein concentrates (YPCs), and two heat-treated flours (YP-IR and YP-RF) were analyzed for fatty acid composition, lipoxygenase (LOX) activity, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and electronic nose (eNose) responses. LOX activity and linoleic acid, a key LOX substrate, differed significantly between YP ingredients. Fifteen VOCs previously linked to off-flavors were identified, with YPIs exhibiting the highest concentrations. eNose analysis correctly predicted YP ingredient identities with 69.5% accuracy and distinguished treated flours from other YP ingredients. Pan breads using two YPI ingredients (YPI-1 and YPI-2) predicted to produce strong off-flavors, the two heat-treated flours and a wheat flour (WF) control were prepared. Breads were evaluated for proximate composition, consumer acceptance, descriptive sensory attributes, and instrumental color. YPI-1 bread was significantly less acceptable overall than WF (p < 0.001) and showed higher pea aroma and flavor (p < 0.001). YPI-2 bread had a denser texture (p < 0.05) and significantly higher wheaty aroma (p < 0.01). Breads made with YP-IR and YP-RF performed closest to the WF control. The heat-treated YP flours demonstrated the greatest potential as pan bread additives. YPI samples were associated with undesirable sensory characteristics. Analyses of the raw YP ingredients effectively predicted sensory differences, highlighting the usefulness of these methods as screening tools during product development. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: This research shows that different value-added yellow pea ingredients can introduce a range of flavors into food matrices, and that flavoromics tools can assist with product development. The two heat-treated yellow pea flours were identified as the best options for bread making because they were less related to pea aroma and flavor in the final product. These findings can help bakers and food manufacturers choose pea ingredients that make high-protein breads taste better.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.