Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41382963›Full record

ArticleMedical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making2026

Do Moral Views Change during a Crisis? An Experiment on Health Care Priority Setting.

Liam Strand, Erik Gustavsson, Gustav Tinghög

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Liam StrandSwedish National Centre for Priorities in Health, Department of Health, Medicine, and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9561-2859
Erik GustavssonSwedish National Centre for Priorities in Health, Department of Health, Medicine, and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5448-9209
Gustav TinghögSwedish National Centre for Priorities in Health, Department of Health, Medicine, and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8159-1249

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundResource scarcity during large-scale crises, such as pandemics, can increase the emphasis on efficiency in medical decision making. However, it remains unclear whether such shifts are primarily driven by the direct experience of scarcity or by the way in which ethical principles for health care priority setting are expressed in the context of a crisis. This study investigates whether a national crisis affects public support for health care priority-setting principles and whether abstract versus concrete formulations of these principles shape that support.DesignWe conducted a preregistered online experiment (

Indexed as

Health Care RationingHealth PrioritiesMoralsPublic OpinionAdultCost-Benefit AnalysisCOVID-19Decision MakingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsSwedenabstractnesscrisis exceptionalismmoral consistencyscarcity theory

Identifiers

PMID41382963
PMCPMC13062458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.