ArticleRomanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
The pineal gland as the hegemonikon of the microcosm: anatomical and philosophical interpretations in Descartes' works.
Article in Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The pineal gland, a small, unpaired structure located at the center of the brain, was first identified as a distinct organ by Galen of Pergamon, yet its function remained obscure until the early modern period, when philosophers and physicians alike try to understand its function. This paper examines René Descartes' interpretation of the pineal gland in the treatise Le Monde and within the intellectual context of the heliocentric revolution. As research investigation methods we used social-historical documentation and hermeneutic analysis on Descartes' Le Monde and L'Homme in relation to the scientific thought of the 17th century, i.e., Harvey's anatomical achievements, and Copernicus', Kepler's, and Galileo's astronomical discoveries. In L'Homme, a chapter of his treatise Le Monde, Descartes analyzed the complex role of the pineal gland not only in a philosophical manner, but also from a medical point of view. The French thinker gave up the analogy between the gland located in the middle of the brain and the pinecone and preferred the analogy with the Sun which in ancient Greek mythology was called Helios, whose role in the cosmic system was considered to be a Hegemonikon. Thus, Descartes named the pineal gland as gland H. Inspired by Copernicus' and Kepler's heliocentric theory and by William Harvey's conception about blood circulation, Descartes has built an analogy between the Sun (Helios), heart, and gland H. As Sun (Helios) ruled the planets in its system, and heart pumped the blood into circulatory system, so gland H (pineal gland) could direct animal spirits through the nerves. Metaphors and analogy method allowed the French philosopher to establish an objective scientific presentation about pineal gland, emphasizing the macrocosm-microcosm analogy and the conceptual shift of the vital center from the heart to the brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.