Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41382350›Full record

ArticlePsychiatry investigation2025

Suicide Risk in Individuals With Psychiatric Disorder: Population-Based Cohort Study.

In-Ae Song, Hye Yoon Park, Tak Kyu Oh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatry investigation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

In-Ae SongDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hye Yoon ParkDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Tak Kyu OhDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe aimed to investigate whether the risks of suicide and non-suicide death vary based on the presence of psychiatric disorders.

methodsPatients diagnosed with psychiatric disorders in South Korea between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2017, were included and referred to as the psychiatric disorder (PY) group. A comparison group, the non-PY group, included individuals who had never been diagnosed with psychiatric disorders, selected using a 1:1 stratified random sampling technique based on age and sex. The patients were followed up for death by suicide (primary endpoint) from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2022. All other causes of death were categorized as non-suicidal deaths.

resultsAfter 1:1 propensity score (PS) matching, 761,384 adult participants (380,692 in each group) were finally included. Of these, 0.2% (830/380,692) of individuals in the PY group died by suicide, compared with <0.01% (13/380,692) in the non-PY group. The PY group had a 64.43-fold higher risk of suicide death (hazard ratio [HR]: 64.43, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 37.25-111.43, p<0.001) compared to the non-PY group. Additionally, 8.6% (32,746/380,692) of the PY group died from non-suicidal causes, while 7.1% (27,043/380,692) of the non-PY group died from non-suicidal causes. PY group had a 1.22-fold higher risk of non-suicidal death (HR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.20-1.24, p<0.001) compared to the non-PY group.

conclusionPsychiatric disorders were associated with a significantly elevated suicidal risk in South Korea, which was substantially greater than the risk of non-suicidal deaths.

Indexed as

Cohort studiesDepressionPsychiatric disorderSuicide

Identifiers

PMID41382350
PMCPMC12699053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.