Observational studyBMC pediatrics2025
Does early screentime exposure or duration affect M-CHAT-R autism screening tool score?
Observational study in BMC pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Screen time and autism like behavior: Cross-sectional study from Georgia.Preventive medicine reports · 2026Article
- Parental concern and multiple dimensions of preschool children's digital media use: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Revised (M-CHAT-R) is commonly used by pediatricians to detect early signs of ASD and guide further diagnostic evaluation, and we hypothesize that increased or early screen time exposure is associated with higher M-CHAT-R scores. Therefore, the study aims to clarify the relationship between early exposure and duration of active screen time with M-CHAT-R scores. MATERIALS AND
methodsAn observational cohort study was conducted, enrolling 646 children (male – 377, female − 269) aged 16 to 30 months. Data collection was conducted over an 8-month period (January–August 2024) at three large pediatric clinics in Tbilisi, Georgia, ensuring a diverse and representative sample. Data included M-CHAT-R/F screening scores (official Georgian translation), daily screen time exposure (minutes per day), and age of initial screen exposure, including background use.
resultsThe analysis revealed a weak positive correlation between M-CHAT-R scores and average active daily screen time (r(644) = 0.15, p < 0.001), although only 2.3% of the variance in M-CHAT-R scores was explained by screen time. A modest association was also observed between higher M-CHAT-R scores and an earlier age of screen exposure (η² = 0.05, p = 0.03), 5% of the variance in M-CHAT-R score explained by the age of screen time exposure. Chi-square analysis indicated a statistically significant association between screen exposure before 6 months of age and M-CHAT-R risk categories (χ²(2) = 12.64, p = 0.002). Notably, the prevalence of high-risk M-CHAT-R scores (8 points or above) was nearly tripled in children exposed to screen time before 6 months (12.24% vs. 4.33%), a difference that reached statistical significance.
conclusionThese findings indicate that early screen time exposure is associated with an increased likelihood of high-risk M-CHAT-R outcomes (scores of 8 or above). In contrast, although there is a statistically significant weak positive correlation between average active daily screen time and M-CHAT-R scores, this variable accounted for only 2.3% of the variance. Future prospective research that incorporates potential confounding factors is necessary to further clarify these relationships. Meanwhile, adherence to the current guidelines from the World Health Organization and the American Academy of Pediatrics is advised.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.