ArticleBMC biology2025
Strategies to improve the efficiency of homing gene drives with multiplexed gRNAs.
Article in BMC biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating multiplexing into confineable gene drives effectively overrides resistance in Anopheles stephensi.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Assessing target genes for homing suppression gene drive.The EMBO journal · 2026Article
- Integrating mosquito genomics into simulation modeling: opportunities for better-informed biocontrol.Current opinion in insect science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCRISPR homing gene drive holds great potential for pest control, but its success is challenged by the generation of resistance alleles through end-joining repair. Using multiple gRNAs to target adjacent sites within a conserved gene can prevent functional resistance by allowing repeated cleavage events, but poor homology during DNA repair may compromise efficiency.
resultsWe first assessed the efficiency of single gRNA drives with truncated homology arms in Drosophila melanogaster mimicking a multiplexed system in which only one site is cleaved. Integrating results into a detailed gRNA multiplexing model, we found that efficiency loss was greater than expected. To mitigate this, we evaluated two new strategies: (1) extended homology arms to span all target sites (with mutations in the PAMs to prevent self-cleavage) and (2) a population-level gRNA multiplexing system involving two or more drives, each carrying two gRNAs. Extended homology arms did not result in notable improvement in conversion efficiency, and the extended region could be lost during drive conversion. The population-level multiplexing gRNAs strategy was more promising, though the intentionally mutated PAM also could not be consistently inherited. Simulations of homing suppression drives applying population-level multiplexed gRNAs increased the success rate of population elimination and reduced the time required for suppression.
conclusionsFuture drive designs requiring a larger number of gRNAs could potentially be improved. The design relying on extended homology arms may not represent an optimal strategy. However, population-level multiplexing gRNAs could serve as a promising alternative, enhancing efficiency while maintaining tolerance to functional resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.