Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41382242›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2025

The trend analysis and comparison of pulmonary arterial hypertension disease burden in China and India from 1990 to 2021: a study based on the Global Burden of Disease 2021 database.

Xuchi Chen, Dongdong Yan, Chang Liu, Jian Dai, Zhijing Li, Yu Lu

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xuchi Chen *Department of Critical Care Medicine, Wuchang Hospital Affiliated to Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430063, Hubei, China.
Dongdong Yan *Department of Critical Care Medicine, Wuchang Hospital Affiliated to Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430063, Hubei, China.
Chang Liu *Department of Critical Care Medicine, Wuchang Hospital Affiliated to Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430063, Hubei, China.
Jian Dai *Department of Critical Care Medicine, Wuchang Hospital Affiliated to Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430063, Hubei, China.
Zhijing LiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Wuchang Hospital Affiliated to Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430063, Hubei, China.
Yu LuWuhan Mental Health Center, Wuhan, 430000, Hubei, China. lyxcly@sohu.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe causes of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) are complex, the treatment methods are limited, and the incidence rate varies greatly among regions.

aimsThis study aims to describe the time trends of age- and sex-specific disease burden of PAH in China from 1990 to 2021, including incidence, prevalence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), and to compare these trends with the disease burden in India.

methodsUsing publicly available data from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) database from 1990 to 2021, this study analyzed the characteristics of the PAH burden in China and India, including changes in incidence, prevalence, mortality, and DALYs. The Joinpoint software was used to calculate the average annual percentage change (AAPC) and the corresponding uncertainty intervals (95% UI) to reflect the trends of PAH burden. A comprehensive comparative analysis and prediction were made for the differences in PAH burden between China and India across multiple dimensions, including age, gender, and period.

resultsFrom 1990 to 2021, the age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR) of PAH in China decreased from 0.51/100,000 to 0.50/100,000, while the ASIR in India decreased from 0.58/100,000 to 0.56/100,000. The age-standardized prevalence rate (ASPR) in China increased from 2.07/100,000 to 2.24/100,000, while India's ASPR increased from 1.62/100,000 to 1.74/100,000. The age-standardized mortality rate (ASMR) in China decreased from 0.61/100,000 to 0.42/100,000, while India's ASMR decreased from 0.29/100,000 to 0.24/100,000. The age-standardized DALY rate (ASDR) in China decreased from 16.18/100,000 to 8.95/100,000, while India's ASDR decreased from 11.73/100,000 to 7.75/100,000. The AAPC for China's PAH burden in ASIR, ASPR, ASMR, and ASDR was -0.07%, 0.25%, - 1.26%, and - 1.91%, respectively, while the AAPC for India's PAH burden was - 0.09%, 0.22%, - 0.66%, and - 1.32%, respectively. In China, the incidence and prevalence of PAH were higher in the 45-74 age group, and the mortality rate was higher in the 70-89 age group; while in India, the incidence and prevalence were higher in the 30-74 age group, and the mortality rates were higher in the < 5 years and 65-84 years age groups. Projections for 2022-2036 suggest a slight increase in the ASIR and ASDR of PAH in China, but overall changes are minimal.

conclusionBoth China and India have large populations, and the disease burden of PAH remains severe. China should focus on strengthening screening interventions for PAH in the middle-aged and elderly populations, while India should particularly focus on strengthening screening and diagnosis for PAH in children under 5 years old to reduce mortality.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessGlobal Burden of DiseasePulmonary Arterial HypertensionAdolescentAdultAgedChinaDatabases, FactualDisability-Adjusted Life YearsFemaleHumansIncidenceIndiaMaleMiddle AgedPattern Analysis, MachineDisability-adjusted life years (DALYs)Global Disease BurdenIncidenceMortalityPrevalencePulmonary arterial hypertension

Identifiers

PMID41382242
PMCPMC12802165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.