Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41382224›Full record

ArticleAddiction science & clinical practice2025

Implementation process evaluation and preliminary effect analysis of an outpatient multidisciplinary follow-up program for adolescents with acute alcohol intoxication in Belgium: the SPIRIT pilot study.

Hanna van Roozendaal, Inge Glazemakers, Lieve Verboven, Brecht De Tavernier, Ann Vander Auwera, Els Verlinden, Frederic De Meulder, Marjolein Mattheij, Stijn Verhulst, Jozef De Dooy and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction science & clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Hanna van RoozendaalFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Antwerp, 2610, Belgium. hanna.vanroozendaal@uantwerpen.be.
Inge GlazemakersFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Antwerp, 2610, Belgium.
Lieve VerbovenDepartment of Mental Health Care for Children and Adolescents, ZAS Hospitals, Wilrijk, Antwerp, 2610, Belgium.
Brecht De TavernierEmergency Department, ZAS Hospitals, Wilrijk, Antwerp, 2610, Belgium.
Ann Vander AuweraDepartment of Paediatrics, ZAS Hospitals, Wilrijk, Antwerp, 2610, Belgium.
Els VerlindenDepartment of Paediatrics, ZAS Hospitals, Wilrijk, Antwerp, 2610, Belgium.
Frederic De MeulderDepartment of Medical Management, ZAS Hospitals, Wilrijk, Antwerp, 2610, Belgium.
Marjolein MattheijDepartment of Paediatrics, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Antwerp, 2650, Belgium.
Stijn VerhulstFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Antwerp, 2610, Belgium.
Jozef De DooyFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Antwerp, 2610, Belgium.
Nico van der LelyFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Antwerp, 2610, Belgium.
Guido Van HalFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Antwerp, 2610, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe number of adolescents with acute alcohol intoxication in Belgium is concerning and standardised follow-up care for these adolescents is lacking. Therefore, a six-month follow-up treatment program called SPIRIT, which stands for Screening and Personalised Feedback Intervention for Alcohol-Intoxicated Teenagers), was developed and pilot-tested in Antwerp (Belgium) in this study. The program consisted of personalised feedback, motivational interviewing, psychological screening, and parental involvement,

methodsThe primary objective of this pilot study was to evaluate the implementation process of SPIRIT, guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Interviews with paediatricians, brainstorming meetings with stakeholders, and participant surveys were conducted and analysed qualitatively. Thematic content deriving from the qualitative data coding was linked to CFIR domains and relevant constructs, which were assessed as factors influencing implementation, relating to (1) barriers and (2) facilitators to implementation. The study's secondary objective consisted of the preliminary analysis of SPIRITs effectiveness in decreasing problematic alcohol use, parent-child interaction, parenting skills, and the detection of underlying psychological disorders. Surveys for participants and their parents were conducted at the moment of discharge from the emergency department (T0) and at follow-up six months later (T2).

resultsThe qualitative analysis revealed that 2 of the CFIR constructs were considered barriers for implementation, namely the constructs financing (outer setting) and sustainability (outcome addendum). Fifteen constructs were considered as a combination of a facilitator and barrier (mainly the domains 'outer setting', 'inner setting' and 'individuals'). The results also showed a strong innovation design and implementation process, with 21 CFIR constructs serving as facilitators in mainly these two above-mentioned domains. Additionally, the quasi-experimental effect analysis showed a decrease in problematic alcohol use among the 12 participants (from a median AUDIT-C score of 4.0 to 1.0, p = 0.013). Also, an improvement in the conflict behaviour between participants (the median Conflict Behaviour Questionnaire, CBQ, score decreased from 6.0 to 1.5, p = 0.044) and their mothers (median CBQ decreased from 8.5 to 3.5, p = 0.037) was seen. Moreover, a significant increase in the parenting skills of fathers was observed (a decrease in mean Parenting Style score from 3.3 to 2.7, p = 0.046).

conclusionsDespite the low sample size, the preliminary effect analysis of this study demonstrated promising results in decreasing problematic alcohol use and improving parent-child interaction. The barriers (mainly in the inner and outer setting domains, for instance patient flow and financing) and facilitators (mainly in the innovation and implementation process domain) assessed in this study using the CFIR framework, could be considered by researchers, physicians and policy makers when implementing similar follow-up programs in healthcare contexts.

trial registrationISRCTN, ISRCTN15542211, 22/04/2025, retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Alcoholic IntoxicationAdolescentBelgiumFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMotivational InterviewingParent-Child RelationsParentingParentsPilot ProjectsProgram EvaluationAdolescentAlcohol drinkingAlcohol intoxicationBelgiumConsolidated framework for implementation researchImplementation sciencePsychosocial interventionQualitative researchQuasi-experimental study

Identifiers

PMID41382224
PMCPMC12720440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.