Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41382221›Full record

ArticleCancer cell international2025

Methylated CfDNA may distinguish between high- and intermediate-risk uveal melanoma: a pilot study.

Mike Wu, Daniël P de Bruyn, Ruben G Boers, Aaron B Beasley, Daan M Hazelaar, Stavros Makrodimitris, Joachim B Boers, Jolanda Vaarwater, Ronald O B de Keizer, Robert M Verdijk and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer cell international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Mike Wu *Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, 3015 GD, The Netherlands.
Daniël P de Bruyn *Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, 3015 GD, The Netherlands.
Ruben G BoersDepartment of Developmental Biology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, 3015 GD, The Netherlands.
Aaron B BeasleyCentre for Precision Health, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, 6027, Australia.
Daan M HazelaarDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, 3015 GD, The Netherlands.
Stavros MakrodimitrisDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, 3015 GD, The Netherlands.
Joachim B BoersDepartment of Developmental Biology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, 3015 GD, The Netherlands.
Jolanda VaarwaterDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, 3015 GD, The Netherlands.
Ronald O B de KeizerThe Rotterdam Eye Hospital, Rotterdam, 3011 BH, The Netherlands.
Robert M VerdijkThe Rotterdam Eye Hospital, Rotterdam, 3011 BH, The Netherlands.
Nicole C NausDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, 3015 GD, The Netherlands.
Dion ParidaensDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, 3015 GD, The Netherlands.
Saskia M WiltingDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, 3015 GD, The Netherlands.
Elin S GrayCentre for Precision Health, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, 6027, Australia.
Wilfred F J van IJckenCenter for Biomics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, 3015 GD, The Netherlands.
Joost GribnauDepartment of Developmental Biology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, 3015 GD, The Netherlands.
Annelies de KleinDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, 3015 GD, The Netherlands.
Erwin Brosens *Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, 3015 GD, The Netherlands. e.brosens@erasmusmc.nl.
Emine Kiliç *Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, 3015 GD, The Netherlands. e.kilic@erasmusmc.nl.
Rotterdam Ocular Melanoma Studygroup

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUveal melanoma (UM) is a highly aggressive malignancy with a metastatic risk that depends on the molecular subclass. This subclass can be determined through molecular characterization of tumor-derived tissue. With eye-sparing treatments, tumor tissue is rarely available for molecular testing. We hypothesized that minimal invasive biomarkers such as methylated cell-free DNA (cfDNA) or circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can be used for prognosis and monitoring of patients.

methodsPlasma cfDNA was isolated from healthy blood donors (HBDs, N = 19) and UM patients (N = 22). Plasma was collected at baseline (localized disease, N = 13) and during follow-up (metastatic disease, N = 9) from independent patients with high metastatic risk (HR, N = 11) (monosomy 3 and/or BAP1-mutated tumor) or intermediate metastatic risk (IR, N = 11) (disomy 3 and/or SF3B1-mutated tumor). Methylation signatures were determined using genome-wide LpnPI-based methylated DNA sequencing (MeD-seq). Samples with a CpG/reads ratio < 20% (N = 3) were excluded. IchorCNA was used to estimate the tumor fraction. cfDNA samples with detectable tumor fraction (N = 2) were analyzed separately from the other cfDNA samples without detectable tumor fraction (N = 18) to reduce noise in downstream analyses. Differentially methylated regions (DMRs) were identified between the following predefined subgroups: UM (N = 11) vs. HBDs (N = 19), and HR (N = 10) vs. IR (N = 7). To visualize clustering, principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical clustering was performed on the DMRs with fold change > 2.0. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA, Z-score > 2.0 and p < 0.05) was performed to evaluate biological relevance.

resultsDistinct clustering was observed between UM and HBDs samples, and between HR and IR samples, although outliers were present in the latter comparison. GSEA implicated eight canonical pathways including the S100 Family Signaling Pathway and RAF/MAP kinase cascade, which are linked to tumorigenesis and immune processes.

conclusionThis pilot study reports on cfDNA methylation signatures that differentiates UM patients from HBDs, and may distinguish between intermediate and high risk UM subgroups, supporting its prognostic potential. However, its role in monitoring disease progression requires further validation. Independent replication studies are warranted to confirm our findings and evaluate the clinical applicability in UM.

Indexed as

BiomarkerDNA methylation in cancerEpigenetic profilingLiquid biopsyOcular melanoma

Identifiers

PMID41382221
PMCPMC12801463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.