Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41382194›Full record

ArticleTropical medicine and health2025

Programmatic approaches to screening for tuberculosis disease: a situational analysis of seven countries in the Western Pacific Region.

Alvin Kuo Jing Teo, Kyung Hyun Oh, Manami Yanagawa, Cecily Miller, Dennis Falzon, Avinash Kanchar, Youngeun Choi, Gyeong In Lee, Fukushi Morishita, Kalpeshsinh Rahevar and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical medicine and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Alvin Kuo Jing TeoFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. alvin.teo@aol.com.
Kyung Hyun OhWorld Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific, Manila, the Philippines.
Manami YanagawaWorld Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific, Manila, the Philippines.
Cecily MillerWorld Health Organization, Global Programme On Tuberculosis & Lung Health, Geneva, Switzerland.
Dennis FalzonWorld Health Organization, Global Programme On Tuberculosis & Lung Health, Geneva, Switzerland.
Avinash KancharWorld Health Organization, Global Programme On Tuberculosis & Lung Health, Geneva, Switzerland.
Youngeun ChoiThe Korean Institute of Tuberculosis, Korean National Tuberculosis Association, Osong, Republic of Korea.
Gyeong In LeeThe Korean Institute of Tuberculosis, Korean National Tuberculosis Association, Osong, Republic of Korea.
Fukushi MorishitaWorld Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific, Manila, the Philippines.
Kalpeshsinh RahevarWorld Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific, Manila, the Philippines.
Rajendra Prasad Hubraj YadavWorld Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific, Manila, the Philippines.
Huong Thi Giang TranWorld Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific, Manila, the Philippines.
Regional TB Consortium

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTuberculosis (TB) remains a significant public health challenge in the Western Pacific Region, which accounts for approximately 20% of the global TB burden. Despite effective diagnostic tools and treatment, many individuals with TB remain undiagnosed or unreported, particularly in high-burden countries. Systematic screening is a key strategy for identifying cases early and reducing transmission. This study presents a situational analysis of TB screening policies, practices, and challenges across seven high-burden countries in the region: Cambodia, China, Lao PDR, Mongolia, Papua New Guinea, the Philippines, and Viet Nam. MAIN BODY: Data were collected through questionnaires, follow-up discussions, and a regional workshop involving National TB Programme representatives and WHO staff. Most countries have national guidelines for systematic screening, prioritising high-risk groups, like people living with HIV and household contacts. Common screening tools include symptom screening, chest X-rays, and WHO-recommended rapid molecular diagnostics. Although asymptomatic TB is increasingly recognised, symptom screening remains the primary initial tool. Chest X-rays with computer-aided detection technologies are available in most countries, but are often limited to donor-funded projects. Screening is conducted through routine healthcare visits, scheduled checks for specific populations (e.g., prisoners, older adults), and ad hoc campaigns. Implementation varies due to resource and infrastructure limitations. While integration with other health services and community-based approaches shows promise, these remain underutilised. Key challenges include limited funding, workforce shortages, low provider awareness, and stigma. The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted TB services, underscoring the need for resilient health systems.

conclusionImproving systematic TB screening requires scaling up sensitive diagnostic tools, decentralising implementation, and strengthening community engagement. Sustainable financing, robust health systems, and multi-sectoral collaboration are critical to reaching the "missing millions" and achieving the End TB goals. This analysis underscores the need for targeted, evidence-based strategies to enhance screening coverage and effectiveness across diverse epidemiological and resource settings.

Identifiers

PMID41382194
PMCPMC12699892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.