ReviewInternational journal for equity in health2025
Visualizing health inequality data: guidance for selecting and designing graphs and maps.
Review in International journal for equity in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Geographic inequalities in exclusive breastfeeding among infants under six months across 18 African countries.International breastfeeding journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Several resources and tools have been developed for carrying out health inequality analysis, including the preparation of disaggregated data and calculation of summary measures of health inequality. There is also a body of literature that addresses best practices for the preparation of commonly used graphs and maps. There is, however, little guidance for the selection and design of appropriate data visuals for corresponding health inequality data and assessments. This paper aims to fill this gap by describing the types of graphs and maps most frequently used for reporting health inequality analyses and recommending how they can be effectively applied to distinct reporting scenarios. For a range of different data visual types, we assess how they can be designed for effectiveness, attending to the principles of accuracy, utility and efficiency. We assess the suitability of different data visuals for reporting the latest status of inequality, change in inequality over time, inequality assessments across settings and impact of eliminating inequality, considering how different data visualization approaches may be needed for reporting disaggregated data versus summary measures of inequality. Effective visuals can enhance the impact of health inequality reporting and support evidence-informed action to advance health equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.