ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2025
Distinguishing pseudoprogression from true tumor growth after stereotactic surgery in vestibular schwannoma: a volumetric and clinical trajectory analysis.
Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionVestibular schwannoma (VS) often shows transient post-radiosurgery swelling ("pseudoprogression," PP) that mimics true progression (TP). We validated volumetric rules to separate PP from TP and linked growth patterns to clinical outcome.
methodWe retrospectively reviewed 259 sporadic VS cases treated with single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (2012-2024). SRS was delivered with a median margin dose of 12 Gy, prescribed to the institutional peripheral isodose line, using a median of 5 isocentres. Tumours were manually segmented on serial MRIs ≥ 24 months. PP was defined as > 20% volume rise ≤ 12 months followed by ≥ 10% fall ≤ 24 months; TP as > 15% rise > 36 months with persistent growth. Two alternative thresholds (> 25% rise any time; >10% rise > 24 months without regression) were tested. Longitudinal trajectories were clustered with Gaussian-mixture models. Outcomes included hearing, facial and trigeminal function, and Dizziness Handicap Index (DHI).
resultsFour growth clusters emerged: early PP (35.5%), late PP (11.2%), stable (41.3%) and TP (12%). The PP rule yielded 86% sensitivity and 93% specificity (AUC 0.92); the TP rule 77%/95% (AUC 0.90). Alternative thresholds performed worse (AUC 0.81-0.85). Serviceable hearing was preserved in ≥ 86% of PP or stable tumours but only 61% in TP (p < 0.01).
conclusionTime-anchored volumetric rules accurately distinguish transient post-SRS swelling from genuine progression. Incorporating these criteria into routine surveillance can prevent premature salvage therapy while ensuring timely intervention for the minority of tumours that truly grow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.