Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41382160›Full record

ReviewActa veterinaria Scandinavica2025

A review of sperm cryopreservation in the domestic dog and cat: part I, from science to clinic.

Eva Axnér

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta veterinaria Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Eva AxnérDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7054, 750 07, Uppsala, SE, Sweden. eva.axner@slu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9233-7038

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Semen cryopreservation is widely applied in the breeding of several domestic animal species. In the domestic dog, artificial insemination with cryopreserved semen is now routinely performed, whereas in the domestic cat the technique is more challenging. Achieving acceptable pregnancy rates requires high post-thaw semen quality. Unfortunately, sperm cells are susceptible to damage caused by temperature reduction. At temperatures below - 130 °C harmful reactions that can damage spermatozoa are essentially halted. Therefore, spermatozoa can be stored in liquid nitrogen at -196 °C for virtually unlimited periods, enabling the transport of genetic material across both time and space. To reach such low temperatures, however, sperm cells must undergo detrimental changes in temperature. Sperm samples are therefore diluted in buffered extenders containing cryoprotective agents that reduce cold shock and freezing induced damages. Despite these measures, freezing and thawing inevitably cause cell injuries, resulting in reduced longevity compared with freshly ejaculated spermatozoa. Therefore, intrauterine insemination and accurate prediction of ovulation are required to achieve acceptable pregnancy results. Protocols for cryopreservation of dog and cat spermatozoa are often adapted from those developed for other species, in which semen preservation is more established. However, sensitivity to cold shock and freezing varies both between species and among individuals, largely due to differences in sperm cell membrane composition. Moreover, spermatozoa from different species may exhibit varying degrees of sensitivity to potentially toxic effects of ingredients in semen extenders. Thus, protocols must be tailored to each species. Understanding mechanisms of cryo-induced cell damage requires a fundamental understanding of how cells are affected by low temperatures. Much of the research on basic cryobiology was conducted decades ago, yet improvements in cryopreservation protocols are still in progress, often driven by empirical studies, comparing alternative strategies. The aim of this review is to synthesize current knowledge on canine and feline semen freezing, placing recent findings in the context of historical research. Several breakthroughs in cell cryobiology have been successfully applied in these species and are still commonly used. Such examples are the basic Tris-buffer, and the use of egg yolk and glycerol in freezing extenders. Future developments may include alternatives to antibiotics and replacement of egg yolk with non-biological alternatives.

Indexed as

CryopreservationSemen PreservationSpermatozoaAnimalsCatsCryoprotective AgentsDogsInsemination, ArtificialMaleSemen AnalysisCryoprotective AgentsCanineFelineFreezingReproductionSemenSpermatozoa

Identifiers

PMID41382160
PMCPMC12801848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.