ArticleBMC health services research2025
Lessons learned from responses to COVID-19 pandemic in rural, Indigenous, and isolated populations in the US and India: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRural, Indigenous, and isolated communities faced unique challenges and opportunities during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Identifying lessons from these communities, which are rarely studied, is crucial for improving future crisis responses similar populations. This study aims to inform similar communities by centralizing lessons learned and improving preparedness for future health crises.
methodsWe examined three geographically and culturally distinct self-governing communities: a Tibetan Buddhist monastic community in southern India, Alaska Native communities in Interior Alaska, and the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe in South Dakota. Through semi-structured interviews conducted from 2021 to 2022 with community members working in healthcare, education, law enforcement, and governance, we analyzed the policies implemented, the decision-making processes behind them, and the psychological experiences of community members during the pandemic.
resultsThe themes identified from the interviews included the creative mobilization of internal resources amid limited external support, such as community members assuming new roles like quarantine enforcement and using shared culture as a resource to change health behaviors. All three communities implemented travel restrictions. Reported stress on a personal and community level was high, particularly due to deaths caused by the pandemic.
conclusionsRural, Indigenous, and isolated communities responded to the COVID-19 pandemic with a range of strategies, including strict shutdowns, travel restrictions, community-driven support, and traditional healing practices. Despite demonstrating resilience and adaptability, they faced challenges such as resource limitations, enforcement difficulties, and community stress, highlighting the need for ongoing support and tailored approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.