ArticleBMC medical ethics2025
Exploring perspectives of Scottish medical students on the proposed 'Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland)' Bill.
Article in BMC medical ethics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe debate over legalising assisted dying is complex and multifaceted, eliciting strong and diverse opinions from all involved parties. Recently, the Scottish Parliament held an initial vote on the issue, opting to progress with proposed legislation. Hearing the perspectives of medical students, as future clinicians, is crucial when considering new medico-legal developments in assisted dying in Scotland. This study aimed to explore and examine medical students' views on assisted dying in Scotland and the specific provisions of the proposed Scottish legislation.
methodsAn online survey was distributed to students at the Scottish medical schools between October 2023 and January 2024. Participants were invited to respond to closed, quantitative questions, designed to assess specific attitudes towards the proposed legislation, followed by optional free-text fields for participants to provide qualitative explanations for their answers. These free-text responses were subsequently subjected to thematic analysis.
resultsA total of 295 students responded to the survey. The majority of respondents were in favour of the legalisation of assisted dying in Scotland (72.4%); however, only 48.5% of respondents thought that assisted dying should be introduced into Scottish legislation as proposed in the current bill. Additionally, 23.4% of respondents indicated they would conscientiously object to participation in the process. A significant number of respondents (n = 135) expressed concerns that the proposed safeguards were inappropriate or insufficient. Autonomy was the most cited medical ethics principle underpinning opinions, followed closely by non-maleficence.
conclusionsThe majority of respondents were in support of assisted dying, but a smaller proportion felt the current proposed bill should be implemented, due to different interpretations of the suitability of proposed safeguards. A significant portion of respondents' perspectives were based on information from their previous training and experience within healthcare. Other perspectives mirrored wider public opinion on end-of-life care and assisted dying principles. While a majority of respondents favour legalising assisted dying in Scotland, significant concerns remain regarding the specific provisions of the proposed bill, highlighting the complex and ethically charged nature of this issue. Key stakeholders and policymakers should actively involve medical students, as future medical practitioners, in the assisted dying discussion to help guide legislation and research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.