Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41382150›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Relational trust in outreach with women experiencing street-involvement in British Columbia, Canada: a qualitative study.

Michelle Gagnon, Sunny Jiao, Shahin Kassam, Linda Dewar, Patricia Tait, Vicky Bungay

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06854770 (The Outreach Project), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06854770 nacompletednot on this map

The Outreach Project: A Study of Women-led, Trauma Informed Outreach to Foster Equity

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of British ColumbiaRan2018 to 2020Enrolled37ConditionsAccess to Health Care, Gender-Based Violence, Safety, Access to Social ServicesArmsSTRENGTH Outreach Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michelle GagnonCapacity: The Centre for Research in Community Engagement and Gender Equity, School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Room 5280 - 5th Floor, 5955 University Blvd, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z1, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2287-2278
Sunny JiaoCapacity: The Centre for Research in Community Engagement and Gender Equity, School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Room 5280 - 5th Floor, 5955 University Blvd, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z1, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4120-4101
Shahin KassamCapacity: The Centre for Research in Community Engagement and Gender Equity, School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Room 5280 - 5th Floor, 5955 University Blvd, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z1, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9624-2404
Linda DewarInner-City Women's Initiatives Society, 101 E Cordova St, Vancouver, BC, V6A 1K7, Canada.
Patricia TaitCapacity: The Centre for Research in Community Engagement and Gender Equity, School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Room 5280 - 5th Floor, 5955 University Blvd, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z1, Canada.
Vicky BungayCapacity: The Centre for Research in Community Engagement and Gender Equity, School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Room 5280 - 5th Floor, 5955 University Blvd, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z1, Canada. vicky.bungay@ubc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6440-7182

Funding

Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada 890-2016-0026Vancouver Foundation UNR16-0443
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen who experience street-involvement are severely underserved in health care. Outreach can address this service gap, but little is known about what constitutes gender-appropriate and effective outreach worker-client relationships in this context.

methodsTo explore the relational attributes of outreach, qualitative interviews were conducted with women (n = 19) enrolled in a pilot study (2017–2020) aimed at designing a gender-specific outreach program in British Columbia and with outreach staff (n = 8). Data analysis focused on women’s experiences, supplemented by outreach staffs’ perspectives. Reflexive thematic analysis informed by central tenets of feminist relational theory and harm reduction was used.

resultsTrust was the overarching theme, conceptualized as a relational, dynamic, and iterative process co-constructed over time. Eight interrelated domains of trust were identified: commitment; consistency; professional boundaries; privacy and confidentiality; empathy; non-judgement; expert knowledge; and “doing with not for”. Relational trust integrated understandings of the impact of gender-based violence, poverty, and drug-related criminalization. When enacted, trust facilitated participants’ engagement with outreach workers, improved care access, and advanced women’s capacities to navigate their general and substance use health care more independently.

conclusionsTrust is a critical element of health and social service delivery and distrust remains a major barrier. These findings advance new conceptualizations of trust that consider the interplay between interpersonal and structural features of care delivery such as stigma, discrimination, colonization, ableism, and classism. Outreach programs emphasizing trust-building as a dynamic and socio-structurally embedded process hold significant potential for improving care engagement among women who are chronically underserved.

trial registrationRetrospectively registered on February 25, 2025 (NCT06854770) with ClinicalTrials.gov.

Indexed as

Community-Institutional RelationsIll-Housed PersonsProfessional-Patient RelationsTrustAdultBritish ColumbiaFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInterviews as TopicPilot ProjectsQualitative ResearchAccess to careGenderOutreachPovertySubstance useViolenceWomen

Identifiers

PMID41382150
PMCPMC12801862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.