Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41382142›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2025

On-scene predictors of injury severity, deterioration, and death following road injury: a systematic scoping review of information available to responders and its use in triage tools.

Jake Gluyas-Harris, George Stephen Russam, Nicholas Aveyard, Tim Nutbeam

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jake Gluyas-HarrisEmergency Department, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK. jacob.gluyas@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-6780-6952
George Stephen RussamAnaesthetic Department, Darlington Memorial Hospital, Darlington, UK. george.russam@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-7008-7061
Nicholas AveyardRoyal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK. nicholas.aveyard@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3519-7582
Tim NutbeamIMPACT, Centre for Post-Collision Research Innovation and Translation, Exeter, UK. timnutbeam@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0814-9240

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRoad injury including motor vehicle collisions (MVCs) remain a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Early recognition of injury severity at the scene is critical to optimise emergency response, yet existing triage systems under- and over-triage substantial numbers of patients. This scoping review aimed to identify physiological, mechanistic, and contextual indicators available at the scene that predict injury severity, deterioration, or death, and to map these indicators across clinical responders, professional bystanders, and lay responders.

methodsWe conducted a systematic scoping review in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Nine electronic databases and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to 11-Jul-24, supplemented by reference chaining and grey literature searches. Eligible studies included observational cohorts, trials, modelling studies, and validation papers involving road injured patients, reporting on-scene variables and subsequent injury severity, deterioration, or mortality outcomes. Data were thematically synthesised into physiological, mechanistic, and contextual domains.

resultsA total of 14,089 articles were identified. Following screening, 402 articles were included for full-text review with an additional 9 identified via hand and reference list searches. 64 papers met eligibility criteria and were included. Physiological indicators such as hypotension, abnormal Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores, and Shock Index derivatives remain critical predictors, but require equipment often unavailable to non-clinical responders. Mechanistic indicators, including intrusion depth and vehicle rollover, were valuable adjuncts but inconsistently defined. Contextual and patient factors, including age, sex and comorbidity, were recognised as important but inconsistently captured. Standardisation of on-scene data collection, simplification of triage tools for bystanders, and novel technologies offer opportunities for improving early recognition.

conclusionBroader recognition, standardisation of nomenclature and recording of physiological, mechanistic, and contextual indicators is essential to strengthen early post-collision care. Enabling all responder groups to identify critical injuries through structured information capture will help strengthen the early links in the Road Injury Chain of Survival and improve outcomes for MVC patients.

Indexed as

Accidents, TrafficEmergency Medical ServicesTriageWounds and InjuriesHumansInjury Severity ScoreTrauma Severity Indices

Identifiers

PMID41382142
PMCPMC12713274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.