ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2025
On-scene predictors of injury severity, deterioration, and death following road injury: a systematic scoping review of information available to responders and its use in triage tools.
Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of transportation methods on pediatric and adolescent severely injured vehicle occupants.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRoad injury including motor vehicle collisions (MVCs) remain a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Early recognition of injury severity at the scene is critical to optimise emergency response, yet existing triage systems under- and over-triage substantial numbers of patients. This scoping review aimed to identify physiological, mechanistic, and contextual indicators available at the scene that predict injury severity, deterioration, or death, and to map these indicators across clinical responders, professional bystanders, and lay responders.
methodsWe conducted a systematic scoping review in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Nine electronic databases and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to 11-Jul-24, supplemented by reference chaining and grey literature searches. Eligible studies included observational cohorts, trials, modelling studies, and validation papers involving road injured patients, reporting on-scene variables and subsequent injury severity, deterioration, or mortality outcomes. Data were thematically synthesised into physiological, mechanistic, and contextual domains.
resultsA total of 14,089 articles were identified. Following screening, 402 articles were included for full-text review with an additional 9 identified via hand and reference list searches. 64 papers met eligibility criteria and were included. Physiological indicators such as hypotension, abnormal Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores, and Shock Index derivatives remain critical predictors, but require equipment often unavailable to non-clinical responders. Mechanistic indicators, including intrusion depth and vehicle rollover, were valuable adjuncts but inconsistently defined. Contextual and patient factors, including age, sex and comorbidity, were recognised as important but inconsistently captured. Standardisation of on-scene data collection, simplification of triage tools for bystanders, and novel technologies offer opportunities for improving early recognition.
conclusionBroader recognition, standardisation of nomenclature and recording of physiological, mechanistic, and contextual indicators is essential to strengthen early post-collision care. Enabling all responder groups to identify critical injuries through structured information capture will help strengthen the early links in the Road Injury Chain of Survival and improve outcomes for MVC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.